AI Article Synopsis
- The Graph Model of Conflict Resolution (GMCR) is used to create a two-stage decision framework for addressing brownfield conflicts.
- In Stage I, the forward GMCR simulates the conflict's development and analyzes its stability to see if a resolution is possible.
- If no resolution is found, Stage II employs the inverse GMCR to help a third party intervene and achieve a positive outcome, illustrated through a case study from Changzhou, China.
Article Abstract
Based on the Graph Model of Conflict Resolution (GMCR), a two-stage decision framework is developed to reveal the essence of brownfield incidents and facilitate the resolution of brownfield conflicts caused by the incidents. More particularly, the forward GMCR is utilized in Stage I, the negotiation stage, to simulate the evolution of a Brownfield Conflict (BC) and predict its potential resolution via stability analysis. If no acceptable equilibrium can be obtained, the BC progresses into Stage II, the third-party-intervention stage, where the inverse GMCR is used to assist a third party in intervening the conflict to achieve a desirable outcome. To illustrate the practicality of this framework, a recent BC that occurred in Changzhou, China, is taken as a case study. Invaluable insights are provided through the computation and investigation of the corresponding preference relationships.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466265 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061039 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!