The beard is arguably one of the most obvious signals of masculinity in humans. Almost 150 years ago, Darwin suggested that beards evolved to communicate formidability to other males, but no studies have investigated whether beards enhance recognition of threatening expressions, such as anger. We found that the presence of a beard increased the speed and accuracy with which participants recognized displays of anger but not happiness (Experiment 1, N = 219). This effect was not due to negative evaluations shared by beardedness and anger or to negative stereotypes associated with beardedness, as beards did not facilitate recognition of another negative expression, sadness (Experiment 2, N = 90), and beards increased the rated prosociality of happy faces in addition to the rated masculinity and aggressiveness of angry faces (Experiment 3, N = 445). A computer-based emotion classifier reproduced the influence of beards on emotion recognition (Experiment 4). The results suggest that beards may alter perceived facial structure, facilitating rapid judgments of anger in ways that conform to evolutionary theory.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797619834876DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

experiment beards
8
beards
7
anger
5
sexual selection
4
selection agonistic
4
agonistic signaling
4
signaling beards
4
recognition
4
beards recognition
4
recognition men's
4

Similar Publications

Using economic games, this study explore how perceptions of trust are influenced by variables such as facial hair style, age, and attractiveness. The aim was to investigate the impact of facial characteristics on financial decisions related to trust. To achieve this, the study conducted a controlled trust experiment in a laboratory setting, manipulating the age and types of facial hair of the individuals being trusted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Environmental changes, such as climate warming and higher herbivory pressure, are altering the carbon balance of Arctic ecosystems; yet, how these drivers modify the carbon balance among different habitats remains uncertain. This hampers our ability to predict changes in the carbon sink strength of tundra ecosystems. We investigated how spring goose grubbing and summer warming-two key environmental-change drivers in the Arctic-alter CO fluxes in three tundra habitats varying in soil moisture and plant-community composition.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current biomechanical models suggest that butterflies and moths use their proboscis as a drinking straw pulling nectar as a continuous liquid column. Our analyses revealed an alternative mode for fluid uptake: drinking bubble trains that help defeat drag. We combined X-ray phase-contrast imaging, optical video microscopy, micro-computed tomography, phylogenetic models of evolution and fluid mechanics models of bubble-train formation to understand the biomechanics of butterfly and moth feeding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aridity drives the response of soil total and particulate organic carbon to drought in temperate grasslands and shrublands.

Sci Adv

October 2024

Institute of Grassland Science, Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology of the Ministry of Education, Jilin Songnen Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.

Article Synopsis
  • Drought events are becoming more common in grasslands and shrublands, affecting soil organic carbon (SOC), which includes different forms like particulate (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC).
  • A global study over 19 sites revealed that in wetter areas (aridity index > 0.65), extreme drought led to a significant decrease in SOC (7.9%) and POC (15.9%), but MAOC levels remained unchanged.
  • In drier regions (aridity index < 0.65), drought did not significantly affect any type of soil organic carbon, indicating that the impact of drought on SOC is influenced by environmental aridity and rainfall variability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Critical care beds are a limited resource, yet research indicates that recommendations for postoperative critical care admission based on patient-level risk stratification are not followed. It is unclear how prioritisation decisions are made in real-world settings and the effect of this prioritisation on outcomes.

Methods: This was a prespecified analysis of an observational cohort study of adult patients undergoing inpatient surgery, conducted in 274 hospitals across the UK and Australasia during 2017.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!