Characteristics and consequences of missed gastric cancer: A multicentric cohort study.

Dig Liver Dis

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, University of Alcala, Spain; Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS),Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain.

Published: June 2019

Background: Missed gastric cancer (MGC) is poorly documented in Mediterranean populations.

Aims: (1) To assess the rate, predictors and survival of MGC. (2) To compare MGC and non-MGC tumors.

Methods: This is a retrospective-cohort study conducted at four centers. MGC was defined as cancer detected within three years after negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastric adenocarcinomas diagnosed between 2008-2015 were included. Patients with no follow-up were excluded.

Results: During the study period 123,395 esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed, with 1374 gastric cancers being diagnosed (1.1%). A total of 1289 gastric cancers were finally included. The overall rate of MGC was 4.7% (61/1289, 3.7-6%). A negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy in MGC patients was independently associated with PPI therapy (p < 0.001), previous Billroth II anastomosis (p = 0.002), and lack of alarm symptoms (p < 0.001). The most frequent location for MGC was the gastric body(52.4%). MGCs were smaller than non-MGCs (31 vs 41 mm, p = 0.047), more often flat or depressed (p = 0.003) and less likely to be encountered as advanced disease. Overall 2-year survival was similar between MGC (34.1%) and Non-MGC (35.3 %) (p = 0.59).

Conclusion: MGC accounted for nearly five percent of newly-diagnosed gastric adenocarcinomas. Overall survival was poor and not different between MGC and non-MGC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2019.02.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

missed gastric
8
gastric cancer
8
negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy
8
gastric cancers
8
mgc
6
gastric
5
characteristics consequences
4
consequences missed
4
cancer multicentric
4
multicentric cohort
4

Similar Publications

A Machine Learning Risk Prediction Model for Gastric Cancer with SHapley Additive exPlanations.

Cancer Res Treat

December 2024

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Purpose: Gastric cancer (GC) prediction models hold potential for enhancing early detection by enabling the identification of high-risk individuals, facilitating personalized risk-based screening, and optimizing the allocation of healthcare resources.

Materials And Methods: In this study, we developed a machine learning-based GC prediction model utilizing data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, encompassing 10,515,949 adults who had not been diagnosed with GC and underwent GC screening during 2013-2014, with a follow-up period of at least five years. The cohort was divided into training and test datasets at an 8:2 ratio, and class imbalance was mitigated through random oversampling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cameron lesions are a unique and relatively rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding that appears in the mucosa of the gastric body in the presence of a large hiatal hernia. These lesions can be a source of occult bleeding and subsequent chronic iron deficiency anemia (IDA) but may often be missed on initial endoscopy, requiring repeat studies to diagnose. Prompt treatment for Cameron lesions is necessary to avoid the high mortality rate associated with them.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI) are important genetic markers in various cancers, especially gastrointestinal and endometrial types, and can indicate responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
  • In a study involving 1,306 cancer cases, dMMR was determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing for specific proteins, while MSI was assessed using pentaplex PCR, revealing an overall MSI-high incidence of 12.1% compared to a dMMR incidence of 20.3%.
  • A significant discrepancy of 19.3% was found between dMMR and MSI results, particularly noted with a 60.9% discrepancy in
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Conventional white light imaging (WLI) often misses early gastric cancer (EGC) cases, prompting a study to compare its effectiveness against linked color imaging (LCI) to improve diagnostic practices.
  • The study evaluated 11 research articles, analyzing the diagnostic performance using methods like the QUADAS-2 tool and Split Component Synthesis (SCS).
  • Results showed LCI significantly outperformed WLI in detecting EGC and gastrointestinal metaplasia (GIM), with higher sensitivity and specificity, establishing LCI as the preferred screening method for both conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!