A New Approach to Accuracy Evaluation of Single-Tooth Abutment Using Two-Dimensional Analysis in Two Intraoral Scanners.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea.

Published: March 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of two intraoral scanners, Trios 3 and EzScan, by comparing deviation errors at five digital cross-sections of single-tooth abutments using 13 stone models.
  • Results showed that the Trios 3 scanner had significantly higher accuracy in the buccal-lingual and transverse sections compared to the EzScan, with mesial-distal sections displaying more errors.
  • Two-dimensional analyses provided more detailed insights into errors than three-dimensional analyses, highlighting that difficult-to-scan areas tend to exhibit higher deviation errors.

Article Abstract

The aim of this study was to two-dimensionally evaluate deviation errors at five digital cross-sections of single-tooth abutment in regards to data obtained from two intraoral scanners, and to evaluate accuracy of individual scanners. Two intraoral scanners, the Trios 3 (3 Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and EzScan (Vatech, Hwaseong, Korea), were evaluated by utilizing 13 stone models. The superimposed 3D data files were sectioned into five different planes: buccal-lingual section (BL), mesial-distal section (MD), transverse high section (TH), transverse middle section (TM), and transverse low section (TL). Accuracy comparison between the two scanners in 5 groups was performed. BL vs. MD of each scanner, and three transverse groups (TH, TM, TL) of each scanner were analyzed for accuracy comparison. In comparison of 2-D analyses for two intraoral scanners, Trios 3 showed statistically significant higher accuracy in root mean square (RMS) at BL, TH, and TL ( < 0.05). For each scanner, RMS value showed that mesial-distal sections were more prone to error than buccal-lingual section, which exhibited statistically significant errors ( < 0.05) while the transverse groups did not. Two-dimensional analysis is more insightful than three-dimensional analysis on single-tooth abutment. In mesiodistal areas, rough prepped areas, and sharp edges where scanner accessibility is difficult, high deviation errors are shown.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6466129PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intraoral scanners
16
single-tooth abutment
12
two-dimensional analysis
8
deviation errors
8
scanners trios
8
accuracy comparison
8
transverse groups
8
scanners
6
transverse
5
approach accuracy
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!