Study Question: Does Day 3 embryo biopsy for pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic (PGT-M) and structural chromosomal aberrations (PGT-SR) affect body composition and blood pressure readings of 6-year-old singletons?
Summary Answer: This study of 87 PGT-M and PGT-SR conceived singletons showed no differences in anthropometric measurements and blood pressure readings in comparison with a matched cohort of peers born after ICSI without embryo biopsy.
What Is Known Already: While neonatal outcomes after PGT conception have been found comparable to those after ICSI without embryo biopsy, only a few studies have reported outcomes after PGT at older ages. Moreover, embryo biopsy is also applied in couples who opt for PGT-M and PGT-SR and hence are not necessarily infertile. Health parameters and in particular body composition data in this group of children are lacking.
Study Design Size Duration: This single-centre matched-pair cohort study evaluated body composition of 6-year-old children born after fresh blastocyst embryo transfer with or without embryo biopsy performed at Day 3 for the purpose of PGT-M and PGT-SR. For each child born after embryo biopsy, a singleton born after transfer of a fresh ICSI embryo at the blastocyst stage and reaching the age of 6 years between May 2011 and June 2017 was matched as closely as possible for gender, age, maternal educational level and birth order.
Participants/materials Setting Methods: Anthropometry (weight, height, BMI, skinfold thickness, waist and mid-upper arm circumference) and blood pressure readings in a longitudinally followed cohort of 87 singletons conceived by PGT-M and PGT-SR and a pairwise matched sample of 87 children conceived by ICSI are described. Results are adjusted for current, neonatal and parental characteristics.
Main Results And The Role Of Chance: From the 124 eligible PGT-M and PGT-SR families, 110 could be reached of whom 23 refused and 87 (87/110 = 79%) participated. All anthropometric measurements, including -scores of BMI, waist and mid-upper arm circumference, were comparable between the PGT-M and PGT-SR (-0.23; 0.27; 0.17, respectively) and ICSI (-0.29; 0.11; 0.11, respectively) groups (all > 0.05). Furthermore, indices of peripheral (triceps) and central (subscapular) adiposity derived from skinfold thickness were comparable (PGT-M and PGT-SR: 14.7 mm; 11.6 mm and ICSI: 15.5 mm; 11.5 mm) as well as the percentage total body fat mass derived from these (PGT-M and PGT-SR: 13.7% and ICSI: 13.9%) (all > 0.05). -scores for blood pressure were also comparable between the PGT and ICSI groups (all > 0.05). Results did not change when adjusted for neonatal (birthweight, birth order), current (age) and parental (smoking during pregnancy, parental BMI) characteristics. Hospitalization rate and surgical intervention rate were not different for PGT-M and PGT-SR children compared to matched peers born after ICSI.
Limitations Reasons For Caution: Although our study describes the largest cohort of singletons born after embryo biopsy worldwide, we were only able to detect moderate differences in anthropometrics and blood pressure with our sample size.
Wider Implications Of The Findings: Although Day 3 embryo biopsy followed by blastocyst transfer is not associated with adverse outcomes regarding anthropometry and blood pressure, future studies should focus on outcomes in children born after trophectoderm biopsy and/or transfer of warmed embryos after vitrification.
Study Funding/competing Interests: This study was supported by Methusalem grants and by grants from Wetenschappelijk Fonds Willy Gepts; all issued by the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). All co-authors, except M.B. declared no conflict of interest. M.B. has received consultancy fees from MSD, Serono Symposia and Merck. The Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel) and the Centre for Medical Genetics have received several educational grants from IBSA, Ferring, Organon, Shering-Plough, Merck for establishing the database for follow-up research and organizing the data collection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276641 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoy013 | DOI Listing |
Hum Reprod
December 2024
Fertility North, Joondalup Private Hospital, Joondalup, WA, Australia.
Study Question: Compared to the 'single biopsy + single vitrification' approach, do 'double biopsy + double vitrification' or 'single biopsy + double vitrification' arrangements compromise subsequent clinical outcomes following euploidy blastocyst transfer?
Summary Answer: Both 'double biopsy + double vitrification' and 'single biopsy + double vitrification' led to reduced live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates and clinical pregnancy rates.
What Is Known Already?: It is not uncommon to receive inconclusive results following blastocyst biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). Often these blastocysts are warmed for re-test after a second biopsy, experiencing 'double biopsy + double vitrification'.
Nat Commun
September 2024
Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
High-throughput sequencing technologies have increasingly led to discovery of disease-causing genetic variants, primarily in postnatal multi-cell DNA samples. However, applying these technologies to preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in nuclear or mitochondrial DNA from single or few-cells biopsied from in vitro fertilised (IVF) embryos is challenging. PGT aims to select IVF embryos without genetic abnormalities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReprod Biomed Online
September 2024
Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Research Question: What are the perspectives of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) patients in Belgium on the ethics of PGT for polygenic risk scoring (PGT-P)?
Design: In-depth interviews (18 in total, 10 couples, 8 women, n = 28) were performed with patients who had undergone treatment with PGT for monogenic/single-gene defects (PGT-M) or chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) between 2017 and 2019 in Belgium. Participants were asked about their own experiences with PGT-M/SR and about their viewpoints on PGT-P, including their own interest and their ideas on its desirability, scope and consequences. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse the interviews.
Porto Biomed J
July 2024
Genetics-Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a diagnostic procedure that has become a powerful complement to assisted reproduction techniques. PGT has numerous indications, and there is a wide range of techniques that can be used, each with advantages and limitations that should be considered before choosing the more adequate one. In this article, it is reviewed the indications for PGT, biopsy and diagnostic technologies, along with their evolution, while also broaching new emerging methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Exp Reprod Med
June 2024
Biomedical Division, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia.
Errors in human DNA may cause genetic disorders. Technological developments have raised hopes for reducing the risks of genetic inheritance among married couples who have a history of such disorders. Among the developments in reproductive health technology that reduce those risks is the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!