Study Question: Does melatonin result in a dose-response effect on sleep quality and daytime sleepiness in women undergoing IVF?
Summary Answer: Melatonin, even when given at high doses twice per day, does not cause significant daytime sleepiness or change night time sleep quantity or quality.
What Is Known Already: Melatonin is being increasingly used as an adjuvant therapy for women undergoing IVF owing to its antioxidative effects. It is widely considered to be sedative but there are scant objective data on the effects of melatonin on sleep in the setting of IVF.
Study Design Size Duration: The study was a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of 116 women recruited between September 2014 and September 2016.
Participants/materials Setting Method: Women who were undergoing their first cycle of IVF at private IVF centers were recruited into the RCT and randomized to receive either placebo, 2 mg, 4 mg or 8 mg of melatonin, twice per day (BD) from Day 2 of their cycle until the day before oocyte retrieval. Each participant wore an accelerometer that provides an estimate of sleep and wake activity for up to 1 week of baseline and throughout treatment (up to 2 weeks). They also kept sleep diaries and completed a Karolinska sleepiness score detailing their night time sleep activity and daytime sleepiness, respectively.
Main Results And The Role Of Chance: In total, 116 women were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (placebo BD ( = 32), melatonin 2 mg BD ( = 29), melatonin 4 mg BD ( = 26), melatonin 8 mg BD ( = 29)). There were no significant differences in daytime Karolinska sleepiness score between groups ( = 0.4), nor was there a significant dose-response trend (β=0.05, 95% CI -0.22-0.31, = 0.7). There were no differences in objective measures of sleep quantity or quality, including wake after sleep onset time, sleep onset latency, and sleep efficiency before and after treatment or between groups. There was an improvement in subjective sleep quality scores from baseline to during treatment in all groups, except 8 mg BD melatonin: placebo (percentage change -13.3%, = 0.01), 2 mg (-14.1%, = 0.03), 4 mg (-8.6%, = 0.01) and 8 mg (-7.8%, = 0.07).
Limitations Reasons For Caution: As this was a subset of a larger trial, the melatonin in ART (MIART) trial, it is possible that the sample size was too small to detect statistically significant differences between the groups.
Wider Implications Of The Findings: While this study suggests that melatonin can be used twice per day at high doses to achieve sustained antioxidation effects, with the reassurance that this will not negatively impact daytime sleepiness or night time sleep habits, the sample size is small and may have missed a clinically significant difference. Nevertheless, our findings may have implications not only for future studies of fertility treatments (including meta-analyses), but also in other medical fields where sustained antioxidation is desired.
Study Funding/competing Interests: This study was funded by the Monash IVF Research and Education Foundation (PY12_15). S.F. is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Postgraduate Scholarship APP1074342) and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Ella Macknight Memorial Scholarship. E.W. is supported by an National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant (APP1113902). S.F., E.W., R.H., B.V., N.L., N.H., M.W., M.L., A.L., P.T., K.L. have nothing to declare. L.R. is a Minority shareholder in Monash IVF Group, has unrestricted grants from MSD®, Merck-Serono® and Ferring® and receives consulting fees from Ferring®. S.N.B. reports consulting fees from Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc®, outside the submitted work.
Trial Registration Number: This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Project ID: ACTRN12613001317785).
Trial Registration Date: 27/11/2013.
Date Of First Patient’s Enrolment: 1/9/2014.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276665 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox027 | DOI Listing |
Environ Res
January 2025
Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Surg Obes Relat Dis
December 2024
General Surgery Department, Bariatric Surgery Program, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Background: Women represent 40% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. This highlights the importance of understanding its effects on pregnancy and newborns (NBs).
Objective: To compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between a group of pregnant women with obesity and those who had prior bariatric surgery.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, affiliated with the School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Background: Angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) is commonly observed in patients with stable angina undergoing coronary angiography. Current guidelines recommend non-invasive stress testing as the first step in diagnosing coronary microvascular disease (CMD). This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of non-invasive stress testing in patients invasively diagnosed with CMD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Case Rep
January 2025
Obstetrics and Gynecology; Divison of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are widely used by reproductive-aged women. Current data suggest that long-term use of COCs can suppress ovarian reserve markers, including anti-mullerian hormone and antral follicle count, which may negatively impact ovarian response and oocyte yield in patients undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation to preserve future reproductive potential. Discontinuation of COCs can improve ovarian stimulation outcomes, though the ideal duration of cessation is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
January 2025
Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Objectives: This study aimed to investigate patients' use of electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) and understand the demographic and clinical factors that may be correlated with patient responses to the BREAST-Q at the preoperative stage of breast cancer. The BREAST-Q is a PROM in questionnaire format, developed and validated to assess satisfaction and quality of life for breast surgery patients.The hypothesis tested is that considering disparities in geography, age and education among responders is essential for capturing a diverse patient population in future Patent-Reported Outcome Measures initiatives, examining how these characteristics are associated with Patent-Reported Outcome Measures utilisation and outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!