Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure.

J Dent Sci

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, PO Box 3263, Abha 61471, Saudi Arabia.

Published: December 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study investigates how different adhesive-composite application techniques impact the bonding strength and durability of dental restorations.
  • Two types of adhesives (pre-cured and co-cured) were tested with various composite applications on extracted teeth to measure bonding strength and resistance to failure under stress.
  • Results indicated that pre-cured adhesives had better bonding to dentin, while preheated and sonic-activated composites exhibited the greatest resistance to failure, making them promising options for dental restorations.

Article Abstract

Background/purpose: The longevity of bonded composite restorations could be affected by the utilized adhesive-composite application techniques. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding values to tooth structure and on the failure resistance of the performed restorations on loading.

Materials And Methods: Resin composite studs, 2 mm in diameter and 4 mm high, were bonded in 2 groups to flattened enamel and dentin surfaces of 80 extracted premolars using pre-cured (PC) and co-cured (CC) self-etch resin adhesive. Studs in each group were built-up in 4 subgroups using either multiple increments of nano-filled composite (IF, control) or single increment of preheated nano-filled (PH), bulk-fill (BF) and sonic-activated bulk-fill composites (SF). Another 80 premolars with standard class II cavities were also restored using the same adhesive-composite application modalities. All specimens were then stressed on a universal testing machine to assess the composite-tooth shear bond strength and the resistance of the performed restorations to failure. The modes of specimens' failure were also assessed following each test.

Results: The PC adhesive provided higher bond strength to dentin (p < 0.05) and comparable bond strength to enamel in comparison to the CC one (p>0.05%). Both PH and BF composites showed lower bond strength to dentin in presence of PC adhesive (p < 0.05). Comparable bond strengths were noticed for PH, BF and SF composites to dentin in presence of CC adhesive (p > 0.05). PH and SF restorations presented the highest resistance to failure (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Both incrementally and bulky-inserted composites offer clinically acceptable bond strength in presence of pre-cured resin adhesive. Both Preheated and sonic-activated composite restorations offer the highest resistance to failure on loading. The preheating procedure renders regular composite material suitable for bulk-fill applications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6388869PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2018.08.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adhesive-composite application
16
application modalities
12
resistance performed
12
performed restorations
12
bond strength
12
influence adhesive-composite
8
modalities bonding
8
tooth structure
8
restorations failure
8
strength dentin
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!