Background/purpose: Chelating agents have been used for the removal of the smear layer on teeth. However, due to inadequate volume and/or penetration of the solutions during irrigation, smear layer removal is less effective in the apical third. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of three chelating solutions with and without manual dynamic irrigation in smear layer removal.
Materials And Methods: Sixty-six single-root canal teeth were decoronated, instrumented, and divided into six experimental groups ( = 10) and two control groups ( = 3). The groups received a final rinse with 1 mL of 17% EDTA and 5% or 10% citric acid (CA) for 1 minute, with or without manual dynamic activation, followed by a final 3-mL rinse with 4.2% NaOCl (5 minutes). The teeth were then longitudinally split and prepared for environmental scanning electron microscopy analysis. Digital images (500×) were taken for smear layer removal evaluation at 2 mm, 6 mm, and 10 mm from the working length.
Results: The most effective smear layer removal occurred with 5% and 10% CA combined with manual dynamic activation (Groups 7 and 8), where significant differences were observed when compared with the EDTA groups (Groups 2 and 6; P < 0.05). We found no significant differences between manual dynamic activation with 5% and 10% CA (Groups 7 and 8) in smear layer or debris removal (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Manual dynamic activation of CA improves smear layer removal, and a reduction in CA concentration to 5% does not compromise smear layer removal in comparison with higher concentrations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6395180 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.01.006 | DOI Listing |
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent
November 2024
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, PDM Dental College and Research Institute, Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India.
Aim: The purpose of the study is to evaluate how well the Endovac system and conventional needle irrigation work to remove smear layers (SR) from primary teeth root canals.
Materials And Methods: Fifty extracted human primary teeth were divided into two equal sections vertically, then positioned within an acrylic model that was secured with screws. Group A (Endovac), = 25, and group B (traditional needle), = 25.
Clin Oral Investig
January 2025
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of universal cements (UCs) to dentin prepared with different diamond burs using various adhesive strategies.
Materials And Methods: One-hundred-twenty molars were prepared to expose the mid-coronal dentin. The teeth were divided into two groups according to diamond bur preparations: coarse and super-fine grit burs.
Eur J Dent
December 2024
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on smear layer removal using a metallic needle and a new polymer needle (IrriFlex, Produits Dentaires SA "PD," Vevey, Switzerland).
Materials And Methods: One hundred and eight single-rooted teeth with one canal were randomly divided into four groups according to the preparation and irrigation needle used: G1-30, 0.04 and IrriFlex ( = 25); G2-25, 0.
J Dent
December 2024
Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address:
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of multi-functional root canal irrigating solutions in the removal of canal wall smear layers, antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and tissue dissolution efficacy.
Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth were mechanically instrumented and irrigated with Triton, EndoJuice™, EDTA, and 0.9 % saline.
PLoS One
December 2024
Department of Endodontics, School of Health and Biosciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná -PUC/PR, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Aim: This study evaluated the smear layer removal provided by conventional, sonic, and ultrasonic irrigation techniques.
Methodology: Forty extracted human mandibular first premolars were selected and instrumented using the ProTaper Next System files and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!