To compare the efficacy and safety of intraocular lens implantation with and without ophthalmic viscoelastic device in phacoemulsification. A randomized prospective study was conducted on 84 eyes of 84 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification by the same surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups after the completion of lens cortex removal. Intraocular lens implantation was performed with balanced salt solution irrigation in group H (n=42, hydroimplantation) and with ophthalmic viscoelastic device in group V (n=42, viscoimplantation). The main outcomes measured were postoperative changes of intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), mean absolute refractive error, time of surgery, and the frequency of complications. Patients were evaluated 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively. There was no significant difference in mean age, gender, preoperative IOP and preoperative CCT between the two groups. IOP and CCT were not significantly different 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively between the two groups. Mean absolute refractive error was also not significantly different between the two groups. Time of surgery was significantly lower in group H than in group V (953.81 ± 88.33 seconds, 1072.33 ± 172.16 seconds, respectively, p<0.001). No other complications were observed during the intraocular lens implantation in the two groups. Hydroimplantation technique is safe and effective in phacoemulsification. Furthermore, reduced time of surgery and reduced cost of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices are the advantages of this technique. OVDs = ophthalmic viscosurgical devices; IOP = intraocular pressure; MARE = mean absolute refractive error; CCT = central corneal thickness; CDE = cumulative dissipated energy; AL = axial length; ACD = anterior chamber depth; ACM = anterior chamber maintainer; ECCE = extracapsular cataract extraction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421496 | PMC |
Purpose: To evaluate dynamic changes in ciliary parameters and Implantable Collamer Lens V4C (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) haptic position using mydriatic and miotic agents and their effects on the central and peripheral vault.
Methods: This study involved 80 eyes from 40 consecutive patients (mean age: 28.05 years; range: 19 to 42 years) examined 3 months after ICL implantation.
Purpose: To evaluate the 12-month rotational stability and outcomes of V4c toric Implantable Collamer Lenses (TICLs) (STAAR Surgical) located at two different lens orientations (horizontal or oblique).
Methods: This retrospective study included a total of 403 eyes with TICL implantation, enrolled between January 2021 and December 2022, that were divided into two groups based on the minimum intended angle off the horizontal axis: horizontal with 263 eyes at an angle ±22.5 degrees or less and oblique with 140 eyes at a minimum intended angle of greater than ±22.
Purpose: To observe and explore the correlation between visual outcomes and intraocular lens (IOL) stability after tri-focal IOL implantation in eyes with high myopia.
Methods: Patients with highly myopic cataract (axial length > 26 mm) were enrolled in this prospective study. Thirty-one eyes (31 patients) received implantation of a trifocal IOL (AcrySof IQ PanOptix TFNT00).
Purpose: To evaluate residual refractive errors after intraocular lens (IOL) extraction and the safety and effectiveness of refractive correction procedures.
Methods: The eligibility criteria for this systematic review were patients who had undergone cataract or clear lens extraction and had experienced residual refractive error. All study designs were considered for inclusion and non-English publications, non-peer reviewed articles, books, and systematic reviews were excluded.
J Refract Surg
January 2025
Purpose: To apply a new method, the Taylor Diagram, and a new concept, the centered root mean square error (cRMSE), in evaluating the performance of IOL formulas.
Methods: The preoperative biometrics were measured with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec) and the postoperative spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was calculated in 888 anonymous patients. The Taylor Diagram was applied to visualize the centered root mean square error (cRMSE) and the correlation coefficient between the predictions and the observations (R).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!