Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Conventional implant impression techniques may introduce distortions in the framework that can lead to a lack of accuracy of the prostheses. Misfit between the restoration and the implants facilitates the occurrence of biomechanical failures and prostheses complications due to inadequate stress dissipation. Digital impressions present an alternative to eliminate procedural distortions by improving the fit between the restoration and the implants. Among the different types of digital impressions, photogrammetry has emerged as an alternative for multiple implant impressions. This case report describes photogrammetric technique for a full-arch rehabilitation in All-on-four of a 68-year-old patient with a fixed implant-supported restoration on the mandible. Photogrammetric technique has demonstrated to be a successful digital alternative to conventional multiple-implant impression. Esthetics and function remained stable over a follow-up period of 1 year. No biomechanical or biologic complications were observed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a42098 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!