AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent studies show that functional connectivity patterns in resting-state fMRI fluctuate, known as dynamic FC (dFC), with the sliding window technique being a common method for analysis.
  • This study compares various correlation metrics (like Pearson and Mutual Information) to assess dFC using test-retest data.
  • Findings indicate that Mutual Information and Variation of Information provide reliable dFC estimates, necessitating a minimum window size of 120 seconds to detect dynamic connections in key brain regions.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies related to assessing functional connectivity (FC) in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging have revealed that the resulting connectivity patterns exhibit considerable fluctuations (dynamic FC [dFC]). A widely applied method for quantifying dFC is the sliding window technique. According to this method, the data are divided into segments with the same length (window size) and a correlation metric is employed to assess the connectivity within these segments, whereby the window size is often empirically chosen.

Methods: In this study, we rigorously investigate the assessment of dFC using the sliding window approach. Specifically, we perform a detailed comparison between different correlation metrics, including Pearson, Spearman and Kendall correlation, Pearson and Spearman partial correlation, Mutual Information (MI), Variation of Information (VI), Kullback-Leibler divergence, Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives and Inverse Covariance.

Results: Using test-retest datasets, we show that MI and VI yielded the most consistent results by achieving high reliability with respect to dFC estimates for different window sizes. Subsequent hypothesis testing, based on multivariate phase randomization surrogate data generation, allowed the identification of dynamic connections between the posterior cingulate cortex and regions in the frontal lobe and inferior parietal lobes, which were overall in agreement with previous studies.

Conclusions: In the case of MI and VI, a window size of at least 120 s was found to be necessary for detecting dFC for some of the previously identified dynamically connected regions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6456784PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1255DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sliding window
12
window size
12
functional connectivity
8
connectivity resting-state
8
window technique
8
dfc sliding
8
pearson spearman
8
window
7
assessment dynamic
4
dynamic functional
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!