Independent prescribing in primary care: A survey of patients', prescribers' and colleagues' perceptions and experiences.

Health Soc Care Community

Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Pharmacy Workforce Studies, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Published: July 2019

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Besides doctors and dentists, an increasing range of healthcare professionals, such as nurses, pharmacists and podiatrists, can become independent prescribers (IPs). As part of an evaluation for independent prescribing funded training, this study investigated views and experiences of IPs, their colleagues and patients about independent prescribing within primary care. Questionnaires capturing quantitative and qualitative data were developed for IPs, their colleagues and patients, informed by existing literature and validated instruments. IPs were identified following independent prescribing training funded by Health Education England Northwest in 2015-2017. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed thematically. Twenty-four patients, 20 IPs and 26 colleagues responded to the questionnaires. Most patient respondents had a long-term medical condition (n = 17) and had regular medicines prescribed (n = 21). IPs were nurses (n = 14), pharmacists (n = 4), one podiatrist (n = 1) and one was unknown. Half of the IPs were current prescribers (n = 10), the other half were still training (to become) IPs (n = 10). Colleague respondents were doctors and nurses (n = 15) other healthcare professionals (n = 8) and practice managers (n = 3). Both current IPs (n = 9) and colleague respondents (n = 25) (strongly) agreed that independent prescribing improved the quality of care provided for patients. Nearly all colleagues were supportive of independent prescribing and believed that they worked well with IPs (n = 25). Patients' perceptions and experiences of their consultations with the IP were mostly positive with the vast majority of respondents (strongly) agreeing that they were very satisfied with their visit to the IP (n = 23). Key barriers and enablers to independent prescribing were centred on IPs' knowledge, competence and organisational factors such as workload, effective teamwork and support from their colleagues. Findings from this study were mainly positive but indicate a need for policy strategies to tackle longstanding barriers to independent prescribing. However, a larger sample size is needed to confirm findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12746DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

independent prescribing
32
ips colleagues
12
ips
10
independent
9
prescribing primary
8
primary care
8
perceptions experiences
8
healthcare professionals
8
colleagues patients
8
qualitative data
8

Similar Publications

Objective: To assess whether social determinants of health (SDOHs) are associated with the first antiseizure medication (ASM) prescribed for newly diagnosed epilepsy.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were followed, and the protocol registered (CRD42023448998). Embase, Medline, and Web of Science were searched up to July 31, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are governed by a cluster of unhealthy behaviours and their determinants, like tobacco and alcohol, unhealthy diet, lack of physical activity, overweight and obesity, pollution (air, water, and soil), and stress. Regulation of these unhealthy behaviours plays a crucial role in blood pressure control among individuals on hypertensive treatment, especially those suffering from uncontrolled hypertension. Hence, the present study aims at identifying the unhealthy behaviours associated with uncontrolled hypertension.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Clozapine is continuously underused. The existing systematic reviews addressing barriers to clozapine prescribing primarily focus on clinical staff's attitudes and perceived barriers to prescribing. However, a preliminary literature search revealed additional literature on the subject not previously included in systematic reviews, including literature on patient perspectives.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In patients with atherosclerotic occlusive diseases, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report that antiplatelets, statins, and antihypertensives reduce the risk of major adverse cardiac events, need for revascularization procedures, mortality, and health care resource use. However, evidence suggests that these patients are not prescribed these medications adequately or do not adhere to them once prescribed.

Objective: We aim to systematically review and meta-analyze RCTs examining the effectiveness of implementation or adherence-supporting strategies for improving health care provider prescription of, or patient adherence to, guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications in patients with atherosclerotic occlusive disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Serotonin (5-HT) is integral to signalling in areas of the brainstem controlling ventilation and is involved in central chemoreception. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), used to effectively increase 5-HT concentrations, are commonly prescribed for depression. The effects of SSRIs on the control of breathing and the potential influence of cerebral blood flow (CBF) have not been directly assessed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!