Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The advent of aortic valve repair alongside the well-established technique of valve replacement changed the landscape of cardiac surgery, as well as the lives of patients suffering from valvular disease. Repair represents a novel option in those unfit for replacement and avoids the burden of lifelong anticoagulation in younger patients. Despite this, the associated risk of persistence of aortic insufficiency, and therefore reoperation, with valvular repair renders clinical decision making between the two techniques difficult. Unlike the burden of evidence supporting mitral valve repair over replacement, the debate surrounding aortic valve surgery continues. This article aims to explore the development of operative techniques underlying aortic valve repair as well as summarising existing research into short- and long-term patient outcomes in both aortic valve repair and replacement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2019.02.007 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!