The oculocardiac reflex and depth of anesthesia measured by brain wave.

BMC Anesthesiol

Providence Anesthesia Group, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

Published: March 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the oculocardiac reflex (OCR), a condition causing bradycardia during strabismus surgery, and how various anesthetic techniques impact it, particularly focusing on monitoring methods like BIS and Narcotrend.
  • The research analyzed data from over 2,800 surgical cases, revealing no significant correlation between the percentage of OCR and brain wave patterns, despite varying anesthetic depth between different muscles tested.
  • The study concluded that while certain anesthetic agents and patient age influenced OCR, a direct link between brain wave measurements and the reflex could not be established.

Article Abstract

Background: The oculocardiac reflex (OCR), bradycardia that occurs during strabismus surgery is a type of trigemino-cardiac reflex (TCR) is blocked by anticholinergics and enhanced by opioids and dexmedetomidine. Two recent studies suggest that deeper inhalational anesthesia monitored by BIS protects against OCR; we wondered if our data correlated similarly.

Methods: In an ongoing, prospective study of OCR/TCR elicited by 10-s, 200 g square-wave traction on extraocular muscles (EOM) from 2009 to 2013, anesthetic depth was estimated in cohorts using either BIS or Narcotrend monitors. The depth of anesthesia was deliberately varied between first and second EOM tested.

Results: From 1992 through 2013, 2833 cases of OCR during strabismus surgery were monitored. Excluding re-operations and cases with anticholinergic, OCR from first EOM traction averaged - 20.2 ± 21.8% (S.D.) with a range from - 95 to + 25% in patients aged 0.2 to 90 (median 6.5) years. We did not find correlation between %OCR and brain wave for 97 patients with BIS monitoring and 91 with Narcotrend. With intra-patient controls between first and second muscle, the difference in brain wave did not correlate with difference in %OCR for BIS (r = 0.0002, 95% C. I -0.0002, 0.002, p = 0.30) or for Narcotrend (r = - 0.001, 95% C. I -0.004, 0.001, p = 0.32). Secondary multi-variable analysis demonstrated significant association on %OCR particularly with BIS monitor, opioid, propofol and nitrous oxide concentration in the second EOM tensioned. Sevoflurane concentration correlated better with BIS monitor in second and third EOM tension. %OCR correlated with younger age (p < 0.01). OCR with rapid onset was more profound than those with gradual onset (difference in means 18, 95% C. I 10, 26%).

Conclusions: We were unable to confirm a direct correlation between brain wave monitor and OCR when using multifactorial anesthetic agents. The discrepency with other studies probably reflects direct impact of inhalational agent concentration and less deliberate quantification of EOM tension. We found no level of BIS or Entropy EEG monitoring that uniformly prevents OCR.

Trial Registry: NCT03663413.

Data: http://www.abcd-vision.org/OCR/OCR%20Brainwave%20de-identified.pdf .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417239PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0712-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

brain wave
12
oculocardiac reflex
8
depth anesthesia
8
strabismus surgery
8
second eom
8
%ocr bis
8
bis monitor
8
bis
6
eom
5
reflex depth
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!