A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Removal of Cr(VI) with nano-FeS and CMC-FeS and transport properties in porous media. | LitMetric

Removal of Cr(VI) with nano-FeS and CMC-FeS and transport properties in porous media.

Environ Technol

College of Environment and Resources, Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun, People's Republic of China.

Published: September 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined how varying CMC (Carboxymethyl cellulose) dosages influence the dispersibility and sedimentation of Iron Sulfide (FeS), along with how initial Cr(VI) concentrations, reaction temperatures, and pH levels affect the removal of Cr(VI) by Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS.
  • The findings indicated that while Nano-FeS tends to clump together and precipitate, CMC-FeS maintains greater dispersibility and prevents settling effectively, even improving Cr(VI removal at high pH levels compared to Nano-FeS.
  • Additionally, CMC-FeS demonstrated superior migration and transport abilities in sandy soils, achieving a significant distance advantage and reduced deposition rates compared to

Article Abstract

We investigated the effect of CMC dosage on dispersibility and sedimentation of FeS, and the effects of initial Cr(VI) concentrations, reaction temperatures and initial pH values on the Cr(VI) removal by Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS through experiments. At the same time, the migration performance and deposition of Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS under different conditions were investigated. The results showed that: Nano-FeS aggregated to floc and precipitated. The 2.4% CMC-FeS had good dispersibility and anti-settling capacity. With the initial concentration of Cr(VI) increased from 10 to 50 mg L, the Cr(VI) removal efficiencies of Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS decreased. CMC prolonged reaction time between FeS and Cr(VI). When the reaction temperature increased from 10°C to 25°C, and the promotion of Cr(VI) reduction by CMC-FeS was higher than that of Nano-FeS. When the initial pH was 3-9, the Cr(VI) removal efficiencies of Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS were almost similar. But Cr(VI) removal by CMC-FeS was significantly higher than by Nano-FeS 23% at pH 12, which indicated that CMC-FeS still had high removal ability for Cr(VI) at high pH. From the breakthrough curves, the penetration ability ( / ) of the two kinds of FeS nanoparticles in coarse, medium and fine sand was CMC-FeS > Nano-FeS. The maximum transport distance ( ) of CMC-FeS was 6.4 times longer than that of Nano-FeS in medium sand. The increase of FeS injection concentration resulted in more FeS deposition into the media, but the CMC modification could significantly reduce the deposition rate (k) and amount of deposition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1588921DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nano-fes cmc-fes
20
crvi removal
16
cmc-fes
10
nano-fes
9
crvi
9
removal efficiencies
8
efficiencies nano-fes
8
cmc-fes higher
8
higher nano-fes
8
removal
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!