Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We investigated the effect of CMC dosage on dispersibility and sedimentation of FeS, and the effects of initial Cr(VI) concentrations, reaction temperatures and initial pH values on the Cr(VI) removal by Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS through experiments. At the same time, the migration performance and deposition of Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS under different conditions were investigated. The results showed that: Nano-FeS aggregated to floc and precipitated. The 2.4% CMC-FeS had good dispersibility and anti-settling capacity. With the initial concentration of Cr(VI) increased from 10 to 50 mg L, the Cr(VI) removal efficiencies of Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS decreased. CMC prolonged reaction time between FeS and Cr(VI). When the reaction temperature increased from 10°C to 25°C, and the promotion of Cr(VI) reduction by CMC-FeS was higher than that of Nano-FeS. When the initial pH was 3-9, the Cr(VI) removal efficiencies of Nano-FeS and CMC-FeS were almost similar. But Cr(VI) removal by CMC-FeS was significantly higher than by Nano-FeS 23% at pH 12, which indicated that CMC-FeS still had high removal ability for Cr(VI) at high pH. From the breakthrough curves, the penetration ability ( / ) of the two kinds of FeS nanoparticles in coarse, medium and fine sand was CMC-FeS > Nano-FeS. The maximum transport distance ( ) of CMC-FeS was 6.4 times longer than that of Nano-FeS in medium sand. The increase of FeS injection concentration resulted in more FeS deposition into the media, but the CMC modification could significantly reduce the deposition rate (k) and amount of deposition.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2019.1588921 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!