Isometric strength and endurance performance of cervical flexor and extensor muscles were compared in women with (n = 30) and without (n = 30) idiopathic neck pain at the craniocervical and cervicothoracic axes. Strength and endurance time (time to task failure in seconds) at 50% maximal voluntary contraction were recorded in 4 directions (craniocervical flexion/extension and cervicothoracic flexion/extension) and 6 strength and endurance ratios were calculated. Participants in both groups were matched for body mass index. The idiopathic neck pain group demonstrated significantly less strength for the cervicothoracic flexors and extensors (1.58-4.7 N·m [12.4%-17.9%] less,  < .04) and significantly less endurance time for the cervicothoracic and craniocervical flexors (10.77-10.9 s [23.3%-27.5%] less,  < .03). The cervicothoracic extension to craniocervical flexion strength ratio was also lower in the idiopathic neck pain group ( = .01); however, no other strength or endurance ratio was significantly different between groups. This exploratory study suggests assessing specific performance parameters accounting for regional muscular differences in the upper and lower neck is potentially informative to understanding impairments in neck pain conditions, particularly as impairments may not be uniform across muscle groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jab.2018-0033DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

strength endurance
16
idiopathic neck
12
neck pain
12
craniocervical cervicothoracic
8
comparative strength
4
endurance
4
endurance parameters
4
parameters craniocervical
4
cervicothoracic
4
cervicothoracic extensors
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!