Does Increased Patient Load Improve Mortality in Burns?: Identifying Benchmark Parameters Defining Quality of Burn Care.

Ann Plast Surg

Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Burn Surgery, Rhein-Maas Klinikum, Würselen, Germany.

Published: April 2019

Introduction: In burn care, as in other medical fields, there is a tendency to increase the required number of patients for center certifications. Does the increase in patient load automatically improve the quality of burn care? What are the benchmark parameters that have been shown to improve burn care?

Methods: To answer these questions, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Livivo were searched from inception through January 2018 for all studies evaluating the influence of treatment parameters on outcomes in different burn care settings.

Results: Fifteen studies were included in this systematic review. In adults, not a single study showed a decreased mortality due to a higher patient load. However, in children, 2 studies demonstrated a further decrease of the already low mortality due to an increase in patient load. In contrast to patient load, benchmark parameters that had a significant influence on the outcome of burn care for adults and children were: single bed isolation, residency programs, American Burn Association certifications of burn centers, speed of wound closure, and standard operating procedures for burn care.

Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates that a clear correlation between patient load and mortality reduction in adult burn treatment is not supported by the existing literature, requiring future studies. In contrast, all efforts aiming to improve the quality of burn care, such as isolation of burn patients, speed of wound closure, American Burn Association verification and especially standard operating procedures for burn care improve survival and quality of burn care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001844DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

burn care
28
patient load
24
quality burn
16
burn
15
benchmark parameters
12
increase patient
8
improve quality
8
systematic review
8
american burn
8
burn association
8

Similar Publications

Background: We previously published the protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial of Proportional Assist Ventilation for Minimizing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation: the PROMIZING study in Trials ( https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07163-w ).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Facial burn injuries can compromise the airways in pediatric patients. Because prompt assessment of airway safety is a must, most assessment algorithms rely mainly on clinical judgment. There is little data on the value or utility of Fiber Optic Laryngoscopy (FOL) as an ancillary test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in geriatric trauma patients with isolated chest or abdominal injuries with or without traumatic brain injury (TBI) receiving whole blood (WB), component (COMP), or WB and component therapy (WB + COMP).

Methods: This retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File dataset from 2017 to 2021 evaluated geriatric (age ≥65) trauma patients with moderate-to-severe isolated chest (abbreviated injury scale (AIS) chest ≥2) or abdominal (AIS abdomen ≥2) injuries with or without TBI (AIS head ≥2) receiving WB, COMP, or WB + COMP. Outcomes included emergency department and 24-h mortality, blood product volume (mL) at 4 hs, and intensive care unit-length of stay.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Electronic and paper delivery of parent proxy and children's report of two scar-specific patient-reported outcome measures (Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale): An equivalence study.

Burns

December 2024

Children's Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation (AusHI), Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.

Introduction: The Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile (BBSIP) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) are used in burn scar assessment to quantify patient health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). These questionnaires were developed using pen-and-paper delivery methods; however, there is a push towards electronic delivery of these questionnaires in both clinical practice and research. Equivalence testing is required to ensure that validity of these paper questionnaires is maintained electronically.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Factors affecting intensive care length of stay in critically ill pediatric patients with burn injuries.

Pediatr Surg Int

December 2024

Department of Pediatric Critical Care, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.

Background: Burns in children are often complex injuries, leading to prolonged length of stay (LOS) and significant morbidity. LOS in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is a key measure for evaluating illness severity, clinical outcomes, and quality of care. Accurate prediction of LOS is vital for improving care planning and resource allocation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!