C-6α and C-7α androstanes were studied to disclose which position among them is more convenient to functionalize to reach superior aromatase inhibition. In the first series, the study of C-6 versus C-7 methyl derivatives led to the very active compound 9 with IC of 0.06 μM and K = 0.025 μM (competitive inhibition). In the second series, the study of C-6 versus C-7 allyl derivatives led to the best aromatase inhibitor 13 of this work with IC of 0.055 μM and K = 0.0225 μM (irreversible inhibition). Beyond these findings, it was concluded that position C-6α is better to functionalize than C-7α, except when there is a C-4 substituent simultaneously. In addition, the methyl group was the best substituent, followed by the allyl group and next by the hydroxyl group. To rationalize the structure-activity relationship of the best inhibitor 13, molecular modeling studies were carried out.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00157DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

series study
8
study c-6
8
c-6 versus
8
versus c-7
8
derivatives led
8
c-6α- c-7α-substituted
4
c-7α-substituted steroidal
4
steroidal aromatase
4
aromatase inhibitors
4
inhibitors better?
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!