Background: Repeat hepatectomy plays a key role in recurrent hepatic tumors. However, it is still unknown whether laparoscopic hepatectomy is suitable for recurrent liver cancers. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) compared with open repeat hepatectomy (ORH).

Methods: Several databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Ovid, were retrieved from date of inception to 31st March 2018. All articles comparing LRH and ORH were identified. Tumor characteristics and perioperative outcomes including resection type, operation time, blood loss, transfusion, complications and hospital stay were evaluated. Data were extracted and calculated using random- or fixed-effect models.

Results: A total of seven non-randomized observational clinical articles including 443 patients were analyzed. LRH was associated with significantly lower blood loss (WMD = -389.09, 95% CI -628.34 to -149.84, P = 0.001), transfusion (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.74, P = 0.019) as well as limited hospital stay (WMD = -4.00, 95% CI -6.58 to -1.42, P = 0.002). No statistical difference was found in the field of tumor characteristics and other perioperative outcomes. In the sensitivity analysis of case-match studies, LRH was associated with significant limited hospital stay, but with significant longer operation time. There were 8 (1.8%, range 0-13.3%) cases of conversion in LRH group.

Conclusions: Based on the results of these limited data, LRH is as feasible and efficient as ORH by expert surgeons in selected patients, whose cancer is resectable at the time of surgery and who have Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2018.10.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

repeat hepatectomy
16
hospital stay
12
open repeat
8
recurrent liver
8
tumor characteristics
8
characteristics perioperative
8
perioperative outcomes
8
operation time
8
blood loss
8
lrh associated
8

Similar Publications

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) remains unclear. This study is based on cases of rHCC after liver resection, aiming to evaluate the influence of preoperative risk factors on the long-term prognosis of patients with rHCC by comparing patients who underwent salvage liver transplantation (SLT) with those who underwent repeat hepatectomy (RH).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 401 consecutive patients with rHCC who underwent SLT or RH between March 2015 and December 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Laparoscopic liver surgery following previous resections poses significant challenges due to adhesions and altered anatomy. Hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (HALR) combines the tactile advantages of open surgery with minimally invasive techniques, potentially benefitting patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of HALR for repeat hepatectomy and compare these outcomes with those of an open liver resection (OR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/aim: Second hepatic resection is a well-established and effective treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite this, the recurrence rate of HCC remains high. The efficacy of third liver resection for re-recurrent HCC is uncertain, and prognostic factors affecting survival after third hepatectomy have not been comprehensively evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN) is defined as a bile duct epithelial tumor with intraductal papillary neoplasia of the bile duct. BiIlN is a precancerous lesion of intrabiliary neoplasia. We performed laparoscopic hepatic resection for recurrent cholangitis due to intrahepatic lithiasis and diagnosed BilIN.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!