Tanning benefits, seasonal effects, and concerns about sunscreen: Measuring health beliefs about UV among college students.

J Am Coll Health

School of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.

Published: April 2021

To develop and validate a scale measuring health beliefs about UV in cloudy climates that may impact UV exposure behaviors. Students at a large university in Oregon completed pilot ( = 115) and final ( = 335) scales online March-July, 2016. Five participants underwent cognitive interviews. Expert feedback, cognitive interviews, and pilot data guided item development and refinement. We conducted factor analysis and invariance testing. The final four-factor model fit well (χ = 37.97,  = 37, RMSEA = 0.000, CFI = 1.000). HBAU subscales are , , , and . Invariance testing supported strong invariance across sex and tanning status. The HBAU measures beliefs that encourage UV exposure and discourage protection (eg, the belief that sunscreen ingredients are toxic). This scale will enable more comprehensive measurement of cognitive predictors of UV exposure for student health, clinical, and research purposes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1574800DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measuring health
8
health beliefs
8
cognitive interviews
8
invariance testing
8
tanning benefits
4
benefits seasonal
4
seasonal effects
4
effects concerns
4
concerns sunscreen
4
sunscreen measuring
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!