Cohesin is a key determinant of chromosome architecture due to its DNA binding and tethering ability. Cohesin binds near centromeres and chromosome arms and also close to telomeres, but its role near telomeres remains elusive. In budding yeast, transcription within 20 kb of telomeres is repressed, in part by the histone-modifying silent information regulator (SIR) complex. However, extensive subtelomeric repressed domains lie outside the SIR-binding region, but the mechanism of silencing in these regions remains poorly understood. Here, we report a role for cohesin in subtelomeric silencing that extends even beyond the zone of SIR binding. Clusters of subtelomeric genes were preferentially derepressed in a cohesin mutant, whereas SIR binding was unaltered. Genetic interactions with known telomere silencing factors indicate that cohesin operates independent of the SIR-mediated pathway for telomeric silencing. Mutant cells exhibited Mpk1-dependent Sir3 hyperphosphorylation that contributes to subtelomeric derepression to a limited extent. Compaction of subtelomeric domains and tethering to the nuclear envelope were impaired in mutant cells. Our findings provide evidence for a unique SIR-independent mechanism of subtelomeric repression mediated by cohesin.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6431164 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816582116 | DOI Listing |
Nucleic Acids Res
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Mammalian genome is hierarchically organized by CTCF and cohesin through loop extrusion mechanism to facilitate the organization of topologically associating domains (TADs). Mounting evidence suggests additional factors/mechanisms exist to orchestrate TAD formation and maintenance. In this study, we investigate the potential role of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) in TAD organization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenes (Basel)
November 2024
Departamento de Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Background/objectives: We analyzed the relationship between synapsis, recombination, and transcription during the spermatogenesis of the grasshopper carrying B chromosomes (type B1).
Methods: The progression of synapsis was interpreted according to the dynamics of the cohesin subunit SMC3 axes. DNA double-strand breaks were revealed by RAD51 immunolabeling, while transcriptional activity was determined by the presence of RNA polymerase II phosphorylated at serine 2 (pRNApol II) immunolabeling.
Adv Sci (Weinh)
December 2024
School of Advanced Agriculture Sciences and School of Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
In eukaryotes, chromatin is compacted within nuclei under the principle of compartmentalization. On top of that, condensin II establishes eukaryotic chromosome territories, while cohesin organizes the vertebrate genome by extruding chromatin loops and forming topologically associating domains (TADs). Thus far, the formation and roles of these chromatin structures in plants remain poorly understood.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Cell
December 2024
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Division of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address:
How specific enhancer-promoter pairing is established remains mostly unclear. Besides the CTCF/cohesin machinery, few nuclear factors have been studied for a direct role in physically connecting regulatory elements. Using a murine erythroid cell model, we show via acute degradation experiments that LDB1 directly and broadly promotes connectivity among regulatory elements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNucleus
December 2025
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Chromatin is a dynamic polymer in constant motion. These motions are heterogeneous between cells and within individual cell nuclei and are profoundly altered in response to DNA damage. The shifts in chromatin motions following genomic insults depend on the temporal and physical scales considered.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!