Background: In nurse practitioner (NP) programs, NP faculty are responsible for evaluating student progress via clinical site visits. The purpose of this pilot study revolved around investigating the following aims: virtual clinical site visit feasibility, faculty perspectives related to implementing virtual and face-to-face clinical site visits, and exploration of student learning and related experiences with both virtual and face-to-face site visits.
Method: This mixed-methods pilot study included cross-sectional assessment of faculty and preceptor perspectives, as well as an open-ended qualitative descriptive survey for students.
Results: Three themes of student experience were found: We Discussed Strengths and Weaknesses, I Had a Better Experience, and I Had Trouble. Faculty years in practice was significantly associated with preference of face-to-face visits and preference of observing preceptor teaching methods.
Conclusion: Student learning needs for clinical site visits are multifactorial. Virtual site visits are feasible, cost effective, and time efficient for faculty and nursing administration needs. [J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(3):160-164.].
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190221-06 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!