This article examines moral hypocrisy and the self-serving bias (SSB) in the sexual infidelity context. We found evidence of self-serving attributions that occur between primary relationship partners following sexual betrayals. Specifically, we found that sexual infidelity perpetrators (a) blamed their primary dyadic partners (i.e., victims) for infidelities significantly more than those victims blamed themselves for such infidelities, (b) blamed the surrounding circumstances for infidelities significantly more than their victims did, and (c) rated the emotional impact of infidelities on their victims as significantly less than victims' ratings of such impact. Moreover, we found that participants with prior experience as both sexual infidelity perpetrators and victims displayed "sexual hypocrisy" by judging others more harshly than themselves for sexually unfaithful behavior. Our findings demonstrate that personality variables associated with sexual infidelity (narcissism, sexual narcissism, avoidant attachment, and primary psychopathy) are also relevant to self-serving attributions in the sexual infidelity context.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167219833392DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sexual infidelity
20
infidelities victims
12
sexual
8
hypocrisy self-serving
8
self-serving bias
8
infidelity context
8
self-serving attributions
8
infidelity perpetrators
8
infidelity
5
victims
5

Similar Publications

Background: Intention toward infidelity or extramarital affairs could be caused by sex life dissatisfaction and low relationship satisfaction. Although sex is just a tiny part of a marriage's relationship, the importance of sex life in a relationship cannot be easily underestimated. Past studies have found some important associations between sex life and relationship satisfaction in determining whether a person would decide to engage in marital infidelity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Male engagement in HIV testing during pregnancy significantly contributes towards the prevention of maternal seroconversion and paediatric HIV acquisition. Despite this, men especially the male partners of pregnant women have been consistently missing in the HIV prevention cascade. The factors accounting for sub-optimal levels in male engagement intersect but reasons for this are poorly understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

From the evolutionary perspective, maintaining a committed relationship is beneficial for reproductive success but involves risks such as losing a partner or infidelity. People typically prefer partners with similar mate value (MV) to avoid rejection. However, when a mate value discrepancy (MVD) arises, the partner with lower MV might employ mate retention strategies to maintain the relationship.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Previous research suggests that human males, like males of many mammalian and avian species, adjust their ejaculate quality in accordance with sperm competition risk. Men who spend less time with their regular female partner since the couple's last copulation produce ejaculates with more sperm at the couple's next copulation (Baker & Bellis, 1993). We conducted a conceptual replication of this research to investigate whether sperm competition risk predicts ejaculate adjustment in human males using additional measures of sperm competition risk (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fragile Egos and Broken Hearts: Narcissistic and Borderline Personality Traits Predict Reactions to Potential Infidelity.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

September 2024

Department of Psychology, Oakland University, 212A Pryale Hall, Rochester, MI 48309, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • The study analyzed how different types of narcissistic and borderline personality traits affected reactions to romantic infidelity in a group of Israeli community members (997 participants).
  • Researchers identified four forms of narcissism: extraverted, antagonistic, neurotic, and communal, each with distinct emotional responses to infidelity scenarios.
  • It was found that neurotic narcissism led to stronger negative emotional reactions in high-threat situations, while antagonistic and communal narcissism impacted relationship evaluations more in low-threat contexts, highlighting the complex dynamics of personality traits in romantic relationships.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!