A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Incidence of Viruses and Virus like Diseases of Sweetpotato in Uganda. | LitMetric

Incidence of Viruses and Virus like Diseases of Sweetpotato in Uganda.

Plant Dis

Department of Plant Biology, Genetics Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7080, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden, and Department of Applied Biology, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Published: April 2003

Sweetpotato plants were surveyed for viruslike diseases and viruses in the four major agroecological zones of Uganda. Testing of 1,260 sweetpotato plants, of which 634 had virus-like symptoms, showed that virus disease incidence ranged from 2.7% (Soroti district, short grassland-savannah zone) to 20% (Mukono district, tall grass-forest mosaic zone). Sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus (SPCSV), Sweet potato feathery mottle virus (SPFMV), Sweet potato mild mottle virus (SPMMV), and sweet potato chlorotic fleck virus (SPCFV) were serologically detected and positive results confirmed by immunocapture reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (IC-RT-PCR) and subsequent sequence analyses of the amplified fragments, except SPCFV, which lacked sequence information. SPCSV and SPFMV were detected in all the 14 districts surveyed, whereas SPMMV and SPCFV were detected in 13 and 8 districts, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that SPCSV and SPFMV, SPFMV and SPMMV, and SPFMV and SPCFV more frequently occurred together than any other virus combinations or as single virus infections. Co-infections of SPCSV with SPFMV and/or SPMMV were associated with more severe and persistent symptoms than infections with each of the viruses alone. Several plants (11%) displaying viruslike symptoms did not react with the virus antisera used, suggesting that more viruses or viruslike agents are infecting sweetpotatoes in Uganda.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.4.329DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sweet potato
16
spcsv spfmv
12
virus
9
sweetpotato plants
8
potato chlorotic
8
mottle virus
8
detected districts
8
spfmv
6
incidence viruses
4
viruses virus
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!