Background: Medicaid is one of the most important health care safety nets for people with disabilities in the United States. Yet, from the beginning Medicaid only covered long-term services and supports (LTSS) through institutional care. In 1981 changes to Medicaid allowed states to provide home and community-based services (HCBS) instead so people with disabilities could receive LTSS in their own homes or in the community. As a result of these changes, there has been a significant decline in institutionalization of people with disabilities in favor of HCBS in the United States. However, the priority of HCBS can be impacted by ideas about community living and disability attitudes, among others. How these attitudes may trickle down to impact Medicaid funding decisions is unknown.
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between HCBS and disability prejudice in the United States.
Methods: We used secondary data about state LTSS expenditures from across the nation in fiscal year (FY) 2015, as well as disability prejudice data (Disability Attitudes Implicit Association Test) from 325,000 people residing in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Results: Findings revealed regardless of the state size or wealth, states with more disability prejudice direct less of their LTSS funding towards HCBS.
Conclusions: Biases and prejudice in disability policy decision-making are obstacles to equality of opportunity and full participation in society, as promised by civil rights.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.01.012 | DOI Listing |
Background: A substantial proportion of patients within regular Mental Health Services have a mild intellectual disability (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF). Previous research has shown that psychiatrists are ambivalent about their own knowledge and skills in providing care to these patients.
Aim: To gain insight into factors that play a role in how psychiatrists experience the provision of care to patients with MID/BIF and comorbid psychiatric disorders.
J Law Med Ethics
December 2024
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, USA.
In this issue, Zakout discusses European Union (EU) legal provisions for inclusion of patients of all types in clinical trials. Shee highlights the unfortunate failure to include adequate numbers of older adults and adults with disabilities in clinical trials of anti-cancer agents. We agree with her argument that this is an ethical issue as well as a scientific and clinical issue.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Law Med Ethics
December 2024
ERASMUS SCHOOL OF LAW, ROTTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS.
The exclusion of the elderly and people with disabilities from cancer clinical research without appropriate justification is discriminatory and is at odds with the ethos of EU principles, laws and research regulations. It further limits study generalizability. Several primary EU laws fronted by the European Charter prohibit engaging in disparate impact discrimination on the grounds of age and disability in all of EU tasks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Pediatr
December 2024
Université Paris Cité, ECEVE UMR 1123, Inserm, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.
Unlabelled: Discrimination is a social construct that discredits individuals based on attributes deemed socially undesirable. Adolescence is a period of transition where individuals acquire skills, values, and experiences that prepare them for adulthood. Adverse experiences during adolescence could particularly affect these acquisitions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDent Clin North Am
January 2025
Geriatric Dentistry, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, 650 West Baltimore Street #3211, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. Electronic address:
Biomedical and structural factors impact oral health for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). The onset of age prevalent chronic diseases and conditions can result in new cognitive or physical disabilities leaving individuals with IDD to contend with ageism as well as ableism and further exclusion from the oral health care systems. Environments and attitudes that inform how health care systems are built and maintained significantly impact quality of life and outcomes, more than the fact of being disabled or old.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!