The Effect of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Curriculum on United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Performance.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Residency Program Director, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Published: May 2019

Purpose: Over the years, a few types of combined oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMS)-MD residency curricula have evolved that differ in how the MD is integrated. The purpose of this study was to look for a difference in United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE) Step 1 pass rates among these different curricula.

Materials And Methods: An anonymous electronic survey was e-mailed to the directors of all 46 United States-based OMS-MD-integrated programs, querying OMS curriculum type and USMLE Step 1 results over the years 2007-2017. Programs were then characterized by the curriculum sequence, whether USMLE Step 1 was taken before or after starting medical school, and the amount of dedicated test preparation time.

Results: Of 46 OMS-MD program directors, 32 (70%) responded. No statistically significant difference in the USMLE Step 1 pass rate was found among the 4 main types of OMS-MD curricula (range, 89 to 95%; P = .06). Completing some part of medical school before taking USMLE Step 1 also had no effect on OMS residents' pass rates (94% vs 92%, P = .23). However, an increasing number of weeks of dedicated test preparation time was significantly correlated with increasing USMLE Step 1 pass rates (87% with no dedicated test preparation time, increasing to 96% with ≥6 weeks of dedicated test preparation time; P = .05). Finally, only 7 of 806 total residents (0.9%) dropped out of a program because of the inability to pass USMLE Step 1.

Conclusions: The data show a high overall USMLE Step 1 pass rate with a direct correlation between the duration of dedicated test preparation time and pass rate. No difference in USMLE Step 1 pass rates was observed based on the sequence of OMS-MD-integrated curricula or the completion of some pre-USMLE medical school before USMLE Step 1 among OMS residents.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.043DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

usmle step
36
step pass
20
dedicated test
20
test preparation
20
pass rates
16
preparation time
16
medical school
12
pass rate
12
step
10
usmle
10

Similar Publications

Background: According to the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Year 2 questionnaire, the percentage of students using online medical education videos (Boards and Beyond®Sketchy Medical®, Youtube) at least once per week increased from 47.7% (2015) to 70.1% (2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Applying to Integrated Thoracic Surgery Residency: A Survey-Based Cost Analysis.

Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep

June 2024

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Background: Application costs are known for other competitive surgical subspecialties but not for integrated thoracic surgery residency (I6). We sought to quantify I6 application costs, assess the value of away rotations and geographic connections, and identify characteristics of matched applicants.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency survey-based database for I6 applicants (2019-2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medical school exams, like those by the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) and the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), assess essential knowledge and skills for safe patient care, essential for student advancement and securing competitive residencies. Understanding the correlation between exam scores and medical school performance, as well as identifying trends among high scorers, provides valuable insights for both medical students and educators. This review examines the link between study resources and NBME exam scores, as well as psychological factors influencing these outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To provide a cross-sectional view of the current opinions surrounding the urology match by analyzing data from the annual Society of Academic Urologists Program Director Surveys conducted between 2022 and 2024.

Methods: Data collected through surveys distributed to all urology program directors (PD) consisting of questions covering program demographics, applicant selection criteria, preference signals (PS), virtual interviews (VI), and other relevant topics.

Results: 89, 90, and 89 PD participated in the surveys for the years 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!