Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are known to present with dysphagia from an early stage. Dysphagia leads to swallowing-related complications, in turn leading to COPD exacerbation. Dysphagia screening is recommended; however little is known of its utility in detecting a COPD phenotype at risk for exacerbation. The simple swallowing provocation test (SSPT), considered to be a standard screening test, requires specific equipment, physician skill and patient discomfort.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to find an easier and less invasive measure to screen for dysphagia in patients with COPD.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with COPD who were screened for dysphagia [Repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), water swallowing test (WST), SSPT and a questionnaire] from June to November 2016. The patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of COPD exacerbation in the past 3 years (ie, exacerbation and non-exacerbation group), and the dysphagia screening results were compared between the groups.
Results: Of the 80 cases included, 42 had 1 or more exacerbations in the past 3 years (exacerbation group), and 38 had none (non-exacerbation group). Statistically significant differences between the groups were observed in the RSST, and vocal change in the WST (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in the results of SSPT, COPD stage and other clinical status.
Conclusions: Compared to the SSPT, RSST and WST may be more appropriate screening methods in patients with COPD. A prospective study is necessary for further assessment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/crj.13014 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!