Background/objectives: If people who hold anti-fat attitudes believe these attitudes to be true, then anti-prejudice appeals are likely to be unsuccessful, if only because the targets will not see their attitudes as in need of change. The current study examined processes that may lead people to see their anti-fat attitudes as 'truth' or as 'prejudice'.

Subjects/methods: Participants ( = 482) read anti-fat statements and were then presented with an interpretation of these statements as 'truth' or 'prejudice'. The source of this interpretation was either an (i) in-group or out-group member and (ii) expert or non-expert. Participants' judgements of the statements were expected to vary such that in-group others and experts would exert more influence than would out-group others and non-experts.

Results: Participants aligned their own interpretations of an anti-fat statement with those of an expert, but not with those of a non-expert, (1,466) = 8.97,  < 0.05, η  = 0.02. The group membership variable had no effect on judgements of 'truth' or 'prejudice' of the anti-fat statement.

Conclusion: The expressions that people believe constitute anti-fat prejudice versus truth about people described as overweight are influenced by exposure to expert opinion (in this case, by medical doctors). Implications for the success of weight-based anti-prejudice appeals and for healthcare provision are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381298PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/osp4.315DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-fat attitudes
12
expert non-expert
8
anti-fat
5
attitudes understood
4
understood prejudice
4
prejudice versus
4
versus truth?
4
truth? experimental
4
experimental study
4
study social
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Weight stigma, particularly negative views about fatness, is linked to disordered eating behaviors in men, specifically muscle dysmorphia (MD), which is a preoccupation with achieving a muscular ideal.
  • A study involving 269 U.S. men examined how these anti-fat attitudes relate to symptoms of MD over time, using multiple surveys spaced a month apart.
  • Findings showed that beliefs about fat people lacking willpower were connected to desires for greater muscle size, and struggles with MD symptoms could lead to fears of gaining weight, suggesting treating weight stigma may help alleviate MD issues in male patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Weight stigma refers to the social rejection, discrimination, and ideological devaluation of individuals because of body size and is a direct result of weight bias and anti-fat attitudes. Individuals with higher weight may be less likely to seek healthcare due to weight stigma, and if or when they do present for care, medical providers with weight bias may fail to provide high quality care. Little, however, is known about the intersectionality of weight stigma and perceptions of healthcare interactions as experienced by individuals who also binge eat.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Commonly used terms like "obese person" have been identified as stigmatizing by those with lived experience. Thus, this study sought to revise a commonly used measure of weight stigmatizing attitudes, the Attitudes Toward Obese Persons (ATOP) scale.

Methods: The original terminology in the 20-item ATOP (e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background This study aimed to establish the reliability and validity of the Anti-Fat Attitudes (AFA) questionnaire and the Beliefs About Obese Persons (BAOP) scale. Methodology A convenience sample of 257 students from three distinct sections of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Grigore T. Popa" Iasi (Medical Faculty, Nutrition and Dietetics, and Nursing) participated in an observational study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Assess the impact of a weight-inclusive podcast (WIP) intervention on body appreciation, intuitive eating (IE), anti-fat attitudes, and weight and health attitudes in university students enrolled in an upper-division nutrition course.

Methods: Quasi-experimental design: Intervention participants listened to 8 weekly WIP episodes (n = 16); the comparison group listened to 8 weekly general nutrition podcasts (n = 29). Intuitive eating, body appreciation, anti-fat attitudes, and general weight and health attitudes were measured preintervention and postintervention.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!