The focus of Cosmetics Europe's programme on serious eye damage/eye irritation is on development of testing strategies and defined approaches for identification of ocular effects of chemicals in the context of OECD's Guidance Document on an Integrated Approach on Testing and Assessment (IATA) for Serious Eye Damage and Eye Irritation. Cosmetics Europe created a comprehensive database of chemicals for which in vitro data are available with corresponding historical in vivo Draize eye data. This database allowed further exploration of the initially proposed strategies from the CON4EI project and to identify opportunities for refinement. The current analysis focused on the development of a defined approach, applicable to liquid non-surfactant chemicals, neat and in dilution, that can distinguish between the three UN GHS categories (Cat. 1, Cat. 2, and No Cat.). Combining the modified-protocol Short Time Exposure (STE) test method (OECD TG 491 with extension to highly volatile substances) with the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Laser Light-Based Opacitometer (BCOP LLBO) test method in a Bottom-Up approach identified 81.2% Cat. 1, 56.3% Cat. 2, and 85.3% No. Cat correctly, with an NPV of 96.7% and a PPV of 68.6%. Therefore, the performance of the defined approach was better than the standalone test methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2019.02.019 | DOI Listing |
Nicotine Tob Res
January 2025
Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Introduction: Varenicline is an α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist with the highest therapeutic efficacy of any pharmacological smoking cessation aid and a 12-month cessation rate of 26%. Genetic variation may be associated with varenicline response, but to date no genome-wide association studies of varenicline response have been published.
Methods: In this study, we investigated the genetic contribution to varenicline effectiveness using two electronic health record-derived phenotypes.
Neuro Oncol
January 2025
Childhood Cancer & Cell Death team (C3 team), Consortium South-ROCK, LabEx DEVweCAN, Institut Convergence Plascan, Centre Léon Bérard, Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (CRCL), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, 69008 Lyon, France.
Background: Brain tumors are the deadliest solid tumors in children and adolescents. Most of these tumors are glial in origin and exhibit strong heterogeneity, hampering the development of effective therapeutic strategies. In the past decades, patient-derived tumor organoids (PDT-O) have emerged as powerful tools for modeling tumoral cell diversity and dynamics, and they could then help defining new therapeutic options for pediatric brain tumors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEJNMMI Res
January 2025
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Background: In clinical practice, several radiopharmaceuticals are used for PSMA-PET imaging, each with distinct biodistribution patterns. This may impact treatment decisions and outcomes, as eligibility for PSMA-directed radioligand therapy is usually assessed by comparing tumoral uptake to normal liver uptake as a reference. In this study, we aimed to compare tracer uptake intraindividually in various reference regions including liver, parotid gland and spleen as well as the respective tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of different F-labeled PSMA ligands to today's standard radiopharmaceutical Ga-PSMA-11 in a series of patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who underwent a dual PSMA-PET examination as part of an individualized diagnostic approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
January 2025
Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom.
A value is conventionally interpreted either as a) the probability by chance of obtaining more extreme results than those observed or b) a tool for declaring significance at a prespecified level. Both approaches carry difficulties: b) does not allow users to make inferences based on the data in hand, and is not rigorously followed by researchers in practice, while (a) is not meaningful as an error rate. Although values retain an important role, these shortcomings are likely to have contributed significantly to the scientific reproducibility crisis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMed Health Care Philos
January 2025
Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany.
There are an increasing number of ways to enhance human abilities, characteristics, and performance. In recent years, the ethical debate on enhancement has focused mainly on the ethical evaluation of new enhancement technologies. Yet, the search for an adequate and shared understanding of enhancement has always remained an important part of the debate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!