A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Effect of Visual Capture Towards Subjective Embodiment Within the Full Body Illusion. | LitMetric

The Effect of Visual Capture Towards Subjective Embodiment Within the Full Body Illusion.

Sci Rep

Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Published: February 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores how visual observation of a mannequin from a first-person perspective can lead to feelings of embodiment, independent of touch.
  • About 40% of participants reported feeling embodied towards the mannequin just from seeing it, which was significantly more than when tactile stimulation was involved on their own body.
  • The type or speed of touch (affective vs non-affective) didn't significantly change how visual observation influenced these embodiment feelings, indicating that visual input alone can be powerful in this context.

Article Abstract

Typically, multisensory illusion paradigms emphasise the importance of synchronous visuotactile integration to induce subjective embodiment towards another body. However, the extent to which embodiment is due to the 'visual capture' of congruent visuoproprioceptive information alone remains unclear. Thus, across two experiments (total N = 80), we investigated how mere visual observation of a mannequin body, viewed from a first-person perspective, influenced subjective embodiment independently from concomitant visuotactile integration. Moreover, we investigated whether slow, affective touch on participants' own, unseen body (without concomitant touch on the seen mannequin) disrupted visual capture effects to a greater degree than fast, non-affective touch. In total, 40% of participants experienced subjective embodiment towards the mannequin body following mere visual observation, and this effect was significantly higher than conditions which included touch to participants own, unseen body. The velocity of the touch that participants received (affective/non-affective) did not differ in modulating visual capture effects. Furthermore, the effects of visual capture and perceived pleasantness of touch was not modulated by subthreshold eating disorder psychopathology. Overall, this study suggests that congruent visuoproprioceptive cues can be sufficient to induce subjective embodiment of a whole body, in the absence of visuotactile integration and beyond mere confabulatory responses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6393432PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39168-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

subjective embodiment
20
visual capture
16
visuotactile integration
12
induce subjective
8
embodiment body
8
congruent visuoproprioceptive
8
mere visual
8
visual observation
8
mannequin body
8
unseen body
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!