System Support Mapping: A Novel Systems Thinking Tool Applied to Assess the Needs of Maternal and Child Health Title V Professionals and Their Partners.

J Public Health Manag Pract

Center for Health Equity Research, Social Medicine Department, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Dr Calancie); Departments of Maternal and Child Health (Dr Margolis) and Health Policy and Management (Dr Hassmiller Lich), Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI), The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Mr Chall); National MCH Workforce Development Center, Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Drs Calancie and Lich, and Ms Mullenix); and Health Systems Transformation, Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs, Washington, District of Columbia (Ms Chaudhry).

Published: August 2021

Context: The Maternal and Child Health (MCH) workforce aims to improve health outcomes for women, children, and families. The work requires coordination and partnerships that span disciplines and service systems. As such, workforce needs assessment requires an approach that is broad, flexible, and "systems-aware."

Objective: To illustrate the use of System Support Mapping, a novel systems thinking tool that was used to guide participants through a structured assessment of their discrete responsibilities, key needs, and specific resources required for each.

Participants: Thirty-four Title V MCH professionals and partners from 15 states or jurisdictions.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Description and frequency of Title V MCH professionals' coded roles, responsibilities, needs, resources, and wishes. An aggregated map illustrating interconnections between identified codes is presented.

Results: State- and local-level MCH professionals reported a range of roles, responsibilities, needs, resources, and wishes. The most and least frequently reported roles, responsibilities, needs, resources, and wishes by state- and local-level MCH professionals are listed, as well as the most frequent connections between those responses. The most frequent responsibility reported in local maps was "link to or provide care or resources" (82%), whereas the most frequent responsibility reported in state maps was "system management" (65%). System management was indirectly connected to 3 wishes: "access to data or information," "funding or resources," and "collaboration, coordination, or support from community or other external organizations."

Conclusions: System Support Mapping can be used to support needs assessment with MCH professionals. System Support Maps show not only the most and least frequently reported roles, responsibilities, needs, resources, and wishes of participants but also how those responses are connected and potentially interdependent. System Support Maps may be useful for MCH leaders determining how best to organize their teams to take on complex public health challenges and prioritize improvements that will better support their work.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000941DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

system support
20
mch professionals
16
roles responsibilities
16
responsibilities resources
16
resources wishes
16
support mapping
12
mapping novel
8
novel systems
8
systems thinking
8
thinking tool
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!