Background: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy seem to reduce postoperative pain compared with classic excisional hemorrhoidectomy, but whether one of them is superior remains unclear.
Objective: We compared transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy.
Design: This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.
Setting: The study was conducted at 6 Spanish centers.
Patients: Patients aged ≥18 years with grade III to IV hemorrhoids were included.
Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy (n = 39) or vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy (n = 41).
Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was the mean postoperative number of days in which patients needed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, 30-day morbidity, patient satisfaction, Vaizey score, hemorrhoid symptoms score, return to work, and quality of life.
Results: More patients were still taking analgesia in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group during the second postoperative week compared with the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group (87.8% vs 53.8%; p = 0.002). For the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group, analgesia consumption continued until day 10.1 (mean; SD = 7.22 d), whereas in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group it continued until day 15.2 (mean; SD = 8.70 d; p = 0.006). The mean daily average pain was similar during the first (p = 0.900) and second postoperative weeks (p = 0.265). Mean operative time was higher for the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group versus the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group (45 min; range, 40-60 vs 20 min; range, 15-41 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications rate, use of laxatives, patient satisfaction, Vaizey score, hemorrhoids symptoms score, return to work, and quality of life at 1 month after surgery were similar between groups.
Limitations: The main limitation of this study was that the 2 groups did not contain equal numbers of grade III and IV hemorrhoids.
Conclusions: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy is associated with a shorter need for postoperative analgesia compared with vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A915.
Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02654249.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001362 | DOI Listing |
Medicine (Baltimore)
November 2024
Department of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Rationale: Retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are unusual clinical presentations whose management is challenging for emergency physicians owing to variations in the object types, anorectal anatomy, sacral curvature, insertion times, and local contamination. Here, we present the diagnosis and treatment in 1 case of retained rectal foreign body.
Patient Concerns: A 62-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a cosmetic bottle inserted into the rectum while bathing.
Dis Colon Rectum
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, the Netherlands.
Dis Colon Rectum
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Dis Colon Rectum
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada.
Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a treatment option for a wide range of rectal lesions. Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently associated complication. Some studies have suggested that the use of alpha-1-blockers may reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention after hernia and colorectal surgery, but evidence is lacking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Gastroenterol
December 2024
Department of Surgery and Centre of Minimal Invasive Surgery, GFO Kliniken Bonn, Bonn 53225, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
This manuscript focused on the surgical challenge of urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery based on the interesting results demonstrated by the observational study of Chen , which was published in the . Urinary dysfunction occurs in one-third of patients treated for rectal cancer. Surgical nerve damage is the main cause of urinary dysfunction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!