Background: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy seem to reduce postoperative pain compared with classic excisional hemorrhoidectomy, but whether one of them is superior remains unclear.

Objective: We compared transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy and vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy.

Design: This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: The study was conducted at 6 Spanish centers.

Patients: Patients aged ≥18 years with grade III to IV hemorrhoids were included.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy (n = 39) or vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy (n = 41).

Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was the mean postoperative number of days in which patients needed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, 30-day morbidity, patient satisfaction, Vaizey score, hemorrhoid symptoms score, return to work, and quality of life.

Results: More patients were still taking analgesia in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group during the second postoperative week compared with the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group (87.8% vs 53.8%; p = 0.002). For the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group, analgesia consumption continued until day 10.1 (mean; SD = 7.22 d), whereas in the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group it continued until day 15.2 (mean; SD = 8.70 d; p = 0.006). The mean daily average pain was similar during the first (p = 0.900) and second postoperative weeks (p = 0.265). Mean operative time was higher for the transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy group versus the vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy group (45 min; range, 40-60 vs 20 min; range, 15-41 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications rate, use of laxatives, patient satisfaction, Vaizey score, hemorrhoids symptoms score, return to work, and quality of life at 1 month after surgery were similar between groups.

Limitations: The main limitation of this study was that the 2 groups did not contain equal numbers of grade III and IV hemorrhoids.

Conclusions: Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization with mucopexy is associated with a shorter need for postoperative analgesia compared with vessel-sealing device hemorrhoidectomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A915.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02654249.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001362DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transanal hemorrhoidal
32
hemorrhoidal dearterialization
32
dearterialization mucopexy
32
vessel-sealing device
32
device hemorrhoidectomy
28
grade iii
12
mucopexy vessel-sealing
12
hemorrhoidectomy group
12
mucopexy group
12
transanal
8

Similar Publications

Rationale: Retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are unusual clinical presentations whose management is challenging for emergency physicians owing to variations in the object types, anorectal anatomy, sacral curvature, insertion times, and local contamination. Here, we present the diagnosis and treatment in 1 case of retained rectal foreign body.

Patient Concerns: A 62-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a cosmetic bottle inserted into the rectum while bathing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endoscopic and Transanal Management of Anastomotic Leak.

Dis Colon Rectum

January 2025

Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a treatment option for a wide range of rectal lesions. Postoperative urinary retention is a frequently associated complication. Some studies have suggested that the use of alpha-1-blockers may reduce the risk of postoperative urinary retention after hernia and colorectal surgery, but evidence is lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This manuscript focused on the surgical challenge of urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery based on the interesting results demonstrated by the observational study of Chen , which was published in the . Urinary dysfunction occurs in one-third of patients treated for rectal cancer. Surgical nerve damage is the main cause of urinary dysfunction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!