The objective of our study was to improve adherence to American College of Radiology (ACR) white paper follow-up imaging recommendations for incidental adnexal lesions seen on pelvic CT (herein referred to as "adherence rate to recommendations"). This quality improvement project was conducted at a large academic teaching hospital. The baseline adherence rate to recommendations was assessed by screening all pelvic CT reports for the period from October 22, 2016, through December 22, 2016, for incidental adnexal findings, followed by manual review. Forty abdominal and cancer imaging radiologists were surveyed to understand the barriers to adoption of the recommendations. Interventions to address the most common identified barriers were implemented on December 23, 2016. The postintervention adherence rate was assessed from December 23, 2016, through February 15, 2017, by again screening CT pelvis reports for incidental adnexal lesions followed by manual review. The change in pre- and postintervention adherence rates was assessed using the Fisher exact test and statistical process control (SPC) p-chart with 3-sigma control limits. The adherence rate to recommendations at baseline was 67% (121/181). Of the 28 of 40 (70%) radiologists who completed the survey, only 29% (8/28) often or consistently used the recommendations. Not remembering the details of the recommendations or not having time to look them up accounted for 83.3% of the barriers cited by radiologists. Interventions consisted of radiologist education and creation of an easily accessible clinical decision support tool incorporated into radiology reporting workflow. The adherence rate to recommendations after the intervention increased to 87% (129/148; < 0.0001), as also shown by the SPC chart. The rate of adherence to follow-up imaging recommendations significantly increased after radiologist education and incorporation of recommendations into the radiologist workflow.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20468 | DOI Listing |
Ann Diagn Pathol
February 2025
Department of Anatomical Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Electronic address:
Radiographics
December 2024
From the Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Chamié Imagem da Mulher, Rua Casa do Ator 1117, CJ 72, São Paulo, SP 04546-004, Brazil (L.P.C.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (W.M.V.B., L.X., P.C.A.); Department of Radiology, Clínica Izabela Pires Franco, Belém, Para, Brazil (I.V.P.F.); Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.K.F.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (A.S.S.B.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (P.J.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz (S.W.Y.).
Endometriosis is a chronic systemic condition characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial-like tissue outside of the uterus. It occurs most often in reproductive-aged patients and less frequently in postmenopausal women. In postmenopausal patients, endometriosis is more common in those undergoing hormone replacement therapy or taking tamoxifen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Clin Lab Sci
September 2024
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
Objective: We report the first documented case of concurrent ectopic complete hydatidiform mole (CHM) and high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) of the fallopian tube, associated with unique histologic features and mutations in the HGSC.
Case Report: The patient presented with pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding. Laboratory examination revealed a positive urine pregnancy test and high serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG).
Front Oncol
October 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Introduction: Centralization of ovarian cancer treatment is associated with higher rates of optimal surgery and longer survival. However, preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer is challenging and some diagnoses are made incidentally after surgery. This study investigated the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients with incidental findings of borderline ovarian tumors or ovarian cancer who were centralized postoperatively and treated with a two-stage surgical procedure, and compared these with those of patients with adnexal masses of suspected malignancy who were offered a single-stage surgical procedure with intraoperative frozen section in a tertiary hospital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!