In 'Obesity, equity and choice' ( 2018;0:1-7. doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-104848), Timothy Wilkinson argues that preventive regulations to address obesity, such as taxes on sugary drinks, are at worst inequitable and at best fail to increase or improve equity. He concludes that we do not yet have good reasons to adopt them. I argue that equity considerations are not as problematic for preventive regulations as Wilkinson suggests.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105352 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!