https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=30794690&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 307946902019112520200309
1932-62031422019PloS onePLoS OneWelfare assessment of novel on-farm killing methods for poultry.e0212872e0212872e021287210.1371/journal.pone.0212872There is a need for novel mechanical devices for dispatching poultry on farm following the introduction of EU Regulation (EC) no. 1099/2009 On the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing. We examined three novel mechanical killing devices: Modified Armadillo, Modified Rabbit Zinger, a novel mechanical cervical dislocation device; and traditional manual cervical dislocation. The four killing methods were tested on 230 chickens across four batches. We measured behavioural, electroencephalogram and post-mortem outcomes in anesthetized laying hens and broilers at two life stages (juveniles and adults/slaughter age). Graeco Latin-Square designs systematically randomized killing treatment, bird type, age and kill order. All birds were lightly anaesthetized immediately prior to the killing treatment with inhalation of Sevoflurane. The novel mechanical cervical dislocation method had the highest kill success rate (single application attempt only, with no signs of recovery) of a mechanical method (96%). The Modified Armadillo was the least reliable with 49% kill success. Spectral analysis of electroencephalogram signals at 2 s intervals for successfully killed birds only revealed progressive decreases in median frequency alongside increases in total power. Later, total power decreased as the birds exhibited isoelectric electroencephalogram signal. Latencies to pre-defined spectral ranges associated with unconsciousness showed that birds subjected to manual and novel mechanical cervical dislocation achieved these states sooner than birds subjected to the modified Armadillo. Nevertheless all methods exhibited short latencies (<4 s). The Modified Rabbit Zinger had the shortest duration of reflex persistence for nictitating membrane, pupillary and rhythmic breathing post method application. Of the methods tested, the novel mechanical cervical dislocation device is the most promising mechanical method for killing poultry on-farm based on a range of behavioural, electroencephalogram and anatomical parameters. This device has the potential to fulfil the current need for a mechanical alternative to manual cervical dislocation.MartinJessica EJE0000-0003-0294-8770The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, Easter Bush Campus, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.SandilandsVictoriaVAnimal and Veterinary Science Research Group, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.SparreyJulianJLivetec Systems Ltd, Silsoe, Bedford, United Kingdom.BakerLaurenceLAnimal and Veterinary Science Research Group, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.DixonLaura MLM0000-0002-1781-8795Animal and Veterinary Science Research Group, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.McKeeganDorothy E FDEFInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.engfigshare10.6084/m9.figshare.7021691.v1Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't20190222
United StatesPLoS One1012850811932-6203IMAnimal HusbandrymethodsAnimal WelfareAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChickensElectrodesElectroencephalographyFemalePoultryRabbitsTurkeysThe authors have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: JS is an employee of a commercial company Livetec Systems Ltd. Based on the research findings, Livetec Systems Ltd is now progressing development of a product. However, the research findings and product are all open access with no IP owned by the Livetec Systems. There are no patents, other products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.
2018830201921120192236020192236020191126602019222epublish30794690PMC638638010.1371/journal.pone.0212872PONE-D-18-25509Gerritzen MA, Lambooij E, Hillebrand SJW, Lankhaar JA, Pieterse C. Behavioral responses of broilers to different gaseous atmospheres, Poult Sci. 2000;79: 928–933. 10.1093/ps/79.6.92810.1093/ps/79.6.92810875779McKeegan DEF, Sparks NHC, Sandilands V, Demmer TGM, Boulcot P, Wathes CM. Physiological responses of laying hens during whole-house killing with carbon dioxide. Brit Poult Sci. 2011;52(6): 645–657.22221230Erasmus MA, Lawlis P, Duncan IJH, Widowski TM. Using time insensibility and estimated time of death to evaluate a nonpenetrating captive bolt, cervical dislocation, and blunt trauma for on-farm killing of turkeys. Poult Sci. 2010;89: 1345–1354. 10.3382/ps.2009-0044510.3382/ps.2009-0044520548061Bader S, Meyer-Kûhling B, Günther R, Breithaupt A, Rautenschlein S, Gruber AD. Anatomical and histologic pathology induced by cervical dislocation following blunt head trauma for on-farm euthanasia of poultry. J Appl Poult Res. 2014;23: 546–556.Martin JE, McKeegan DEF Sparrey J, Sandilands V. Comparison of novel mechanical cervical dislocation and a modified captive bolt for on-farm killing of poultry on behavioural reflex responses and anatomical pathology. Anim Welf. 2016;252: 227–241.Sparrey JM, Sandercock DM, Sparks NHC, Sandilands V. Current and novel methods for killing poultry individually on-farm. Worlds Poult Sci J. 2014;70(4): 737–758.HSA. Practical Slaughter of Poultry: A Guide for the Small Producer. 2nd Edition Humane Slaughter Association; United Kingdom.Martin JE, McKeegan DEF, Sparrey J, Sandilands V. Evaluation of potential killing performance of novel percussive and cervical dislocation tools in chicken cadavers. Brit Poult Sci. 2017;58(3): 216–223.28084791European Council. European Council Regulation (EC) 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the Protection of Animals at the Time of Killing. 2009. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009R1099&from=ENShi R, Pryor JD. Pathological Changes of Isolated Spinal Cord Axons in Response to Mechanical Stretch. Neurosci. 2002;110: 765–777.11934483Gregory NG, Wotton SB. Comparison of neck dislocation and percussion of the head on visual evoked responses in the chicken's brain. Vet Rec. 1990;126: 570–572.2368304Erasmus MA, Turner PV, Nykamp SG, Widowski TM. Brain and skull lesions resulting from use of percussive bolt, cervical dislocation by stretching, cervical dislocation by crushing and blunt trauma in turkeys. Vet Rec. 2010;167: 850–858. 10.1136/vr.c505110.1136/vr.c505121262650Raj ABM, O'Callaghan M. Evaluation of a pneumatically operated captive bolt for stunning/killing broiler chickens. Brit Poult Sci. 2001;42: 295–299.11469546Anil MH, Love S, Williams S, Shand A, McKinstry JL, Helps CR, et al. Potential contamination of beef carcasses with brain tissue at slaughter. Vet Rec. 1999;145: 460–462.10576281Tidswell SJ, Blackmore DK, Newhook JC. Slaughter methods: Electroencephalographs (EEG) studies on spinal cord section, decapitation and gross trauma of the brain in lambs. N Z Vet J. 1987;35: 46–49. 10.1080/00480169.1987.3537710.1080/00480169.1987.3537716031370Knudsen SK. A review of the criteria used to assess insensibility and death in hunted whales compared to other species. Vet J. 2005;169: 42–59. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.02.00710.1016/j.tvjl.2004.02.00715683763McIlhone AE, Beausoleil NJ, Johnson CB, Mellor DJ. Effects of isoflurane, sevoflurane and methoxyflurane on the electroencephalogram of the chicken. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014;41: 613–620. 10.1111/vaa.1215410.1111/vaa.1215424628924McKeegan DEF, Reimert HGM, Hindle VA, Boulcott P, Sparrey JM, Gerritzen MA. Physiological and behavioural responses of poultry exposed to gas filled high expansion foam. Poult Sci. 2013;92: 1145–1154. 10.3382/ps.2012-0258710.3382/ps.2012-0258723571322Sandercock DA, Auckburally A, Flaherty D, Sandilands V, McKeegan DEF. Avian reflex and electroencephalogram responses in different states of consciousness. Physiol Behav. 2014;133: 252–259. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.03010.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.03024878315Coenen AML, Lankhaar J, Lowe JC, McKeegan DEF. Remote monitoring of electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and behavior during controlled atomsphere stunning in broilers: Implications for welfare. Poult Sci. 2009;8: 10–19.19096051Woolcott CR, Torrey S, Turner PV, Serpa L, Schwean-Lardner K, Widowski TM. Evaluation of Two Models of Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices for On-Farm Euthanasia of Turkeys. Animals. 2018;8(3): 42PMC586753029558419Martin JE, Vizzier-Thaxton Y, Christensen K, Mitchell MA, McKeegan DEF. Behavioural, brain and cardiac responses to hypobaric hypoxia in chickens. Physiol Behav. 2016;163: 25–36. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.03810.1016/j.physbeh.2016.04.03827117817Lowe JC, Abeyesinghe SM, Demmers TGM, Wathes CM, McKeegan DEF. A novel telemetric logging system for recording physiological signals in unrestrained animals. Comput Electron Agric. 2007;57: 74–79.Martin P, Bateson P. Measuring Behaviour. An Introductory Guide Cambridge University Press; 2007.Tonner PH. Classic electroencephalographic parameters: Median frequency, spectral edge frequency etc. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006;20: 147–159.16634422Kent JP, Salamon A. A need for clarity in animal welfare regulation and research terminology: What is ‘cervical dislocation’ and ‘stunning’ in on-farm poultry slaughter? Int J Poult Sci. 2018;17: 205–210.Constant I, Seeman R, Murat I. Sevoflurane and epileptiform EEG changes. Paediatr Anaesth. 2005;15: 266–274. 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01538.x10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01538.x15787916Heinke W, Koelsch S. The effects of anesthetics on brain activity and cognitive function. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005;18: 625–631. 10.1097/01.aco.0000189879.67092.1210.1097/01.aco.0000189879.67092.1216534303Haberham ZL, van den Brom WE, Haagen AJV, Groot HNM, Baumans V, Hellebrekers LJ. The rat vertex-middle Latency Auditory-Evoked Potential as indicator of anaesthetic depth: a comparison with evoked-reflex testing. Brain Res. 2000;873: 287–290.10930556Gibson TJ, Johnson CB, Murrell JC, Hulls CM, Mitchinson SL, Stafford KJ, et al. Electroencephalographic responses of halothane-anaesthetised calves to slaughter by ventral-neck incision without prior stunning. N Z Vet J. 2009;57: 77–83. 10.1080/00480169.2009.3688210.1080/00480169.2009.3688219471325Martoft L, Jensen EW, Rodriguez BE, Jorgensen PF, Forslid A, Pedersen HD. Middle-latency auditory evoked potentials during induction of thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs. Lab Anim. 2001;35: 353–363. 10.1258/002367701191195810.1258/002367701191195811669320Verhoeven MTW, Gerritzen MA, Hellebrekers LJ, Kemp B. Indicators used in livestock to assess unconsciousness after stunning: a review. Animal. 2015;9(2): 320–330. 10.1017/S175173111400259610.1017/S1751731114002596PMC429953525354537Gwin JT, Gramann K, Makeig S, Ferris DP. Removal of Movement Artifact from High-Denisty EEG recorded during Walking and Running. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103: 3526–3534. 10.1152/jn.00105.201010.1152/jn.00105.2010PMC377458720410364Blackman NL, Cheetham K, Blackmore DK. Differences in blood supply to the cerebral cortex between sheep and calves during slaughter. Res Vet Sci. 1986;40: 252–254.3704345Van de Sluis HJ, Dwars RM, Vernooij JCM, Landman WJM. Cloacal reflexes and uptake of fluorescein-labeled polystyrene beads in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2009;88: 1242–1249. 10.3382/ps.2008-0015510.3382/ps.2008-0015519439636