Background: Pain management after surgery is crucial to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. Acute pain services (APS) are multidisciplinary teams that represent a modern strategy to address pain inside hospitals. The APS defines and applies pain treatment protocols specific for each surgery. To evaluate the performance of the APS at our institute, we performed a large retrospective cohort study focusing on complications of epidural analgesia and IV opiates.
Methods: Data from the 10 years of activity of the APS were collected. Pain was assessed using the VAS at rest (VASr) and during movement (VASm) at each daily visit; the presence of side effects and complications was also assessed.
Results: A total of 17,913 adult patients were followed by APS during the study period. Epidural analgesia was used in 7,776 cases (43%), while 9,239 (52%) patients used IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). A combination of the 2 was used in 87 patients (0.5%). A total of 456 perineural catheters (2.6%) were placed, while 442 patients(2.5%) used other analgesic techniques. We recorded 163 dural punctures during catheter placement, with no epidural hematoma, epidural abscess, or meningitis, and no permanent modification in sensitive or motor functions.
Conclusions: In our large case series, APS was confirmed safe and effective in treating postoperative pain, using both epidural analgesia and IV PCA with morphine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/papr.12777 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Anaesthesiol
February 2025
From the Department of Anesthesia, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China (XC, YT, QY, LS, HL, LW, CJ, XC).
Background: Rapid onset of epidural analgesia is an important concern for the parturient. Commonly, the local anaesthetic mixture is administered through the epidural catheter. Drugs administered through the epidural needle might decrease the onset time and enhance the spread of medication within the epidural space.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Anaesthesiol
February 2025
From the Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle de O'Donnell, 48, 28009 Madrid, Madrid, Spain (NB), the Servicio de Anestesia, Hospital Universitario Sanitas La Zarzuela, Madrid, c/ Pleyades, 25, 28023 Madrid, Spain (NB), the Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, P° de la Castellana, 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain (IVG), the Department of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesiology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet & Institute of Clinical Medicine, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (AA, KL), the University Hospital Würzburg, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Würzburg, Germany (PK, SR), the Division of Anesthesia Critical Care and Pain, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Israel (CFW), the London North West NHS University Trust, Watford Road, London, UK HA1 3UJ (NL), the Department of Anesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, Liège University Hospital, Belgium (PYD), the Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz. Av. de los Reyes Católicos, 2. 28040 Madrid. Spain (EGA), the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Pain Treatment, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Shmuel Beyth St 12, Jerusalem, 9103102 Israel (AI), the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Sjukhusvägen, 75185, Uppsala, Sweden (AK), the Department of Anesthesia, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikvah, Israel affiliated with Tel Aviv University Medical School (SOZ), the Department of Anaesthesiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (OvdB), the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, and Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Belgium (MvdV), the Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University General Hospital of Valencia, Methodology Department, European University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain (CSR).
Background: Labour epidural analgesia reportedly fails in up to 10 to 25% of cases. A joint taskforce of European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) experts was created to develop this focused guideline on the management of failing epidural analgesia in a previously well functioning epidural catheter.
Design: Six clinical questions were defined using a PICO (Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome) strategy to conduct a systematic literature search.
Cureus
December 2024
Intensive Care Unit, Unidade Local Saúde Viseu Dão-Lafões, Viseu, PRT.
Introduction: Pain management in thoracic trauma patients has, historically, relied heavily on systemic analgesic approaches, mostly opioids, associated with numerous adverse effects. Locoregional anesthesia/analgesia (LRAA), presents a promising alternative by specifically targeting pain pathways at the injury site.
Methods: This study investigates the impact of LRAA on pain management and clinical outcomes in thoracic trauma patients within an ICU setting.
Am J Emerg Med
December 2024
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Background: Various regional anesthesia techniques have been studied for blunt chest wall trauma over the past decades, but their impact on patient outcomes remains unclear. This systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis aimed to identify the most effective regional anesthesia techniques for different outcomes in blunt thoracic trauma patients.
Methods: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials comparing regional anesthesia techniques (thoracic epidural, erector spinae plane block, serratus anterior plane block, intercostal block, paravertebral block, intrapleural block, retrolaminar block) and standard intravenous analgesia.
Mymensingh Med J
January 2025
Dr Md Khairul Kabir Khan, Junior Consultant, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Mymensingh, Bangladesh; E-mail:
Different additives have been used to improve the duration and quality of analgesia of the local anaesthetic used in the single-dose caudal block technique, such as opioids, epinephrine, clonidine, neostigmine, etc. Dexmedetomidine is a potent and a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist having a sympatholytic, sedative, and analgesic effect and has been described as a safe and effective additive in many anaesthetic and analgesic techniques. Another agent is Fentanyl, a lipophilic opioid, is added frequently to local anaesthetics which least likely to cause respiratory depression when given extradurally, because of its high lipid solubility.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!