AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of fluoride varnish (FV) application on reducing dental caries in Chilean preschool children, using a decision analytic model (DAM) to analyze cost-effectiveness.
  • Various FV interventions were tested against an oral health counseling-only approach over two years, revealing that FV without screening was both the most effective and cost-efficient method.
  • Results showed a 3.7% increase in caries-free children at a cost of £3 per child and identified factors affecting cost-effectiveness, including the age of FV application and the qualifications of the staff administering it.

Article Abstract

Objectives: This study illustrates the use of a decision analytic model (DAM) to evaluate whether fluoride varnish application (FV) increases the proportion of caries-free children in the Chilean preschool population, at an acceptable cost.

Methods: Different FV interventions were compared with an oral health counselling-only intervention. The FV interventions were tested (with and without screening) every 6 months over 2 years, in either a preschool setting or during a well-child programme appointment in a primary care setting. A Markov model was developed to simulate the FV performance. The model was populated with data obtained from Chilean epidemiologic studies, a systematic review and a costing study. The counselling-only intervention was compared with FV interventions to estimate the incremental cost per child. As there was uncertainty in terms of precise parameter values both probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: Delivery of FV in a primary care setting without screening was the most effective and the least costly intervention. Compared with counselling-only intervention, this intervention increased the prevalence of caries-free children in the population by 3.7%, with an extra cost (in March 2015) of £3 per caries-free child. The results were sensitive to the starting age of FV application; increasing age would reduce the cost-effectiveness of the FV intervention. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness improves if some equipment such as an oral hygiene kit was not used and if less costly but qualified staff applied FV rather than dentists.

Conclusions: This analysis allowed the comparison of the performance of FV in realistic scenarios incorporating important aspects of health and education policies. The application of FV in a primary care setting was the most cost-effective strategy. The work demonstrated that both the methodology and results are useful for decision-makers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12447DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

counselling-only intervention
12
primary care
12
care setting
12
fluoride varnish
8
decision analytic
8
analytic model
8
caries-free children
8
intervention compared
8
intervention
6
assessing cost-effectiveness
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!