AI Article Synopsis

  • Modern mass spectrometry has become a key tool in quantitative proteomics, allowing for the measurement of peptide quantities in samples, although it isn't inherently quantitative due to varying ionization efficiencies.
  • The use of isobaric labeling for peptides enables relative quantification by utilizing tags that appear identical in mass and properties but differ in isotopic composition; these tags produce distinct reporter ions during mass spectrometry analysis.
  • Despite their benefits, current isobaric labeling reagents face challenges like high production costs, limited selectivity, and suboptimal sensitivity, prompting ongoing research to develop more effective and affordable tagging methods.

Article Abstract

Modern mass spectrometry is one of the most frequently used methods of quantitative proteomics, enabling determination of the amount of peptides in a sample. Although mass spectrometry is not inherently a quantitative method due to differences in the ionization efficiency of various analytes, the application of isotope-coded labeling allows relative quantification of proteins and proteins. Over the past decade, a new method for derivatization of tryptic peptides using isobaric labels has been proposed. The labels consist of reporter and balanced groups. They have the same molecular weights and chemical properties, but differ in the distribution of stable heavy isotopes. These tags are designed in such a way that during high energy collision induced dissociation (CID) by tandem mass spectrometry, the isobaric tag is fragmented in the specific linker region, yielding reporter ions with different masses. The mass shifts among the reporter groups are compensated by the balancing groups so that the overall mass is the same for all forms of the reagent. Samples of peptides are labeled with the isobaric mass tags in parallel and combined for analysis. Quantification of individual peptides is achieved by comparing the intensity of reporter ions in the tandem mass (MS/MS) spectra. Isobaric markers have found a wide range of potential applications in proteomics. However, the currently available isobaric labeling reagents have some drawbacks, such as high cost of production, insufficient selectivity of the derivatization, and relatively limited enhancement of sensitivity of the analysis. Therefore, efforts have been devoted to the development of new isobaric markers with increased usability. The search for new isobaric markers is focused on developing a more selective method of introducing a tag into a peptide molecule, increasing the multiplexicity of markers, lowering the cost of synthesis, and increasing the sensitivity of measurement by using ionization tags containing quaternary ammonium salts. Here, the trends in the design of new isobaric labeling reagents for quantitative proteomics isobaric derivatization strategies in proteomics are reviewed, with a particular emphasis on isobaric ionization tags. The presented review focused on different types of isobaric reagents used in quantitative proteomics, their chemistry, and advantages offer by their application.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6412310PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules24040701DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quantitative proteomics
16
isobaric
12
isobaric labeling
12
labeling reagents
12
reagents quantitative
12
mass spectrometry
12
isobaric markers
12
trends design
8
design isobaric
8
tandem mass
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!