A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A cone-shaped gradient coil design for high-resolution MRI head imaging. | LitMetric

A cone-shaped gradient coil design for high-resolution MRI head imaging.

Phys Med Biol

School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.

Published: April 2019

Insertable head gradient coils offer significant advantages such as high gradient strength and fast gradient switching speed owing to shorter distances to the target region of interest than whole-body cylindrical coils. To produce superior gradient performance, the local head coil is typically designed with an asymmetric configuration to accommodate both the shoulders and head of a patient, leading to tough dimensional constraints and practical limits to the coil implementation. In this paper, we propose a new cone-shaped model to improve the performance of the asymmetric head coils and to mitigate patient claustrophobia. The primary coils are designed with a larger diameter at the patient end for access and a smaller diameter at the service end to bring wires closer to the human head, while the secondary coils are arranged on a cylindrical former to improve coil efficiency. Two cases are studied in this paper. Case I: inner bore size at the patient end (diameter 42 cm) is fixed as the design reference. In this case, inner diameters at any other position vary with the conical tilting angles. Compared with a set of conical gradient coils designed with tilting angles ranging from 0 to 14°, it is found that the optimal coil performance is achieved at the tilting angle of 14°. The key performance parameters have been improved by 100%-200% for the transverse coils, and about 50% for the longitudinal coils compared with the cylindrical counterpart with the reference bore size (that is, the same diameter of 42 cm). The conical coils also produce less heat in the gradient structure and lower acoustic noise in the field of view. Case II: inner bore size at the iso-centre (diameter 34 cm) is set as the design reference. It is also found that, compared with 34 cm diameter cylindrical coils, the conical transverse coil performance has been improved at an angle of 14°. The key coil performance increases by 20%-50% for transverse coil but decreases by 20%-40% for the longitudinal coil. However, compared with the tight cylindrical structure (e.g. 34 cm diameter), the tilting angle will provide patient-friendly space for imaging and handling, which can be critical for fMRI and other brain studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab084aDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

case inner
12
bore size
12
coil performance
12
coils
10
coil
9
gradient coils
8
cylindrical coils
8
coils produce
8
coils designed
8
inner bore
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!