Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

N Engl J Med

From Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (R.J.M.) and Pfizer (S.H.), New York; Private Medical Institution Euromedservice (K.P.) and Nonstate Health Institution Road Clinical Hospital-Russian Railways (A.V.), St. Petersburg, and the Moscow Scientific Research Oncology Institute, Moscow (B.A.) - all in Russia; the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam (J.H.); the Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland (B.R.); Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif (L.A.), and Centre Léon Bérard, University of Lyon, Lyon (S.N.) - both in France; the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (M.T.C.); University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow (B.V.), and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London (J.L.) - both in the United Kingdom; British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (C.K.), and Lady Davis Institute and Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal (W.H.M.) - both in Canada; Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan (M.U.); University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea (J.L.L.); Macquarie University, Sydney (H.G.); Department of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (M.S.); Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC (M.B.A.); Department of Urology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany (J.B.); Pfizer, Cambridge (J.W., A.C.), and the Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston (T.K.C.) - both in Massachusetts; Pfizer (M.M., A.P.) and Pfizer Italia (C.F.), Milan; Pfizer, San Diego, CA (P.B.R.); and Pfizer, Groton, CT (B.H.).

Published: March 2019

Background: In a single-group, phase 1b trial, avelumab plus axitinib resulted in objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This phase 3 trial involving previously untreated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma compared avelumab plus axitinib with the standard-of-care sunitinib.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive avelumab (10 mg per kilogram of body weight) intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib (5 mg) orally twice daily or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The two independent primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors. A key secondary end point was progression-free survival in the overall population; other end points included objective response and safety.

Results: A total of 886 patients were assigned to receive avelumab plus axitinib (442 patients) or sunitinib (444 patients). Among the 560 patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (63.2%), the median progression-free survival was 13.8 months with avelumab plus axitinib, as compared with 7.2 months with sunitinib (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.79; P<0.001); in the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 13.8 months, as compared with 8.4 months (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; P<0.001). Among the patients with PD-L1-positive tumors, the objective response rate was 55.2% with avelumab plus axitinib and 25.5% with sunitinib; at a median follow-up for overall survival of 11.6 months and 10.7 months in the two groups, 37 patients and 44 patients had died, respectively. Adverse events during treatment occurred in 99.5% of patients in the avelumab-plus-axitinib group and in 99.3% of patients in the sunitinib group; these events were grade 3 or higher in 71.2% and 71.5% of the patients in the respective groups.

Conclusions: Progression-free survival was significantly longer with avelumab plus axitinib than with sunitinib among patients who received these agents as first-line treatment for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Pfizer and Merck [Darmstadt, Germany]; JAVELIN Renal 101 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02684006.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6716603PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1816047DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

avelumab axitinib
20
advanced renal-cell
12
renal-cell carcinoma
12
progression-free survival
12
phase trial
8
patients
8
patients advanced
8
receive avelumab
8
orally daily
8
pd-l1-positive tumors
8

Similar Publications

Background: In the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), first-line treatment with avelumab + axitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and a higher objective response rate (ORR) vs sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report the final analysis, including the primary analysis of overall survival (OS).

Patients And Methods: Patients with untreated aRCC (any prognostic risk score) were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of avelumab + axitinib in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, information is limited regarding the activity of avelumab + axitinib in patients with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). In Japan, post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of patients with RCC receiving avelumab + axitinib treatment in general clinical practice was undertaken.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Avelumab + axitinib was approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in Japan in December 2019. We report long-term real-world outcomes with first-line avelumab + axitinib from the J-DART2 study in Japan.

Methods: J-DART2 was a multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective study examining clinical data from patients with curatively unresectable locally advanced or metastatic RCC who started treatment with first-line avelumab + axitinib in Japan between December 2019 and October 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the efficacy and safety of molecular-targeted agents for treating recurrent or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (R/M ACC), as there is no consensus on their effectiveness.
  • A systematic review included 28 studies with 849 patients, analyzing key outcomes like the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), highlighting that multiple kinase inhibitors (MKIs) show improved results compared to other targeted therapies.
  • The study found a low pooled ORR of 4.0% but a high disease control rate (DCR) of 80.5%, and identified fatigue, hypertension, and nausea as the most common adverse effects, suggesting potential benefits of combining MKIs with immune checkpoint inhibitors for better
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Different combination therapies using anti - PD-1 / PD-L1 or CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) are widely used in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In the absents of established biomarkers, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been discussed as potential predictors of response.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data of 134 patients with mRCC undergoing ICI treatment (Nivolumab, Ipilimumab and Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab and Axitinib or Avelumab and Axitinib) between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!