Background: MR image intensity nonuniformity is often observed at 7T. Reference scans from the body coil used for uniformity correction at lower field strengths are typically not available at 7T.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel algorithm, Uniform Combined Reconstruction (UNICORN), to correct receive coil-induced nonuniformity in musculoskeletal 7T MRI without the use of a reference scan.

Study Type: Retrospective image analysis study.

Subjects: MRI data of 20 subjects was retrospectively processed offline. Field Strength/Sequence: Knees of 20 subjects were imaged at 7T with a single-channel transmit, 28-channel phased-array receive knee coil. A turbo-spin-echo sequence was used to acquire 33 series of images.

Assessment: Three fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists with cumulative experience of 42 years reviewed the images. The uniformity, contrast, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and overall image quality were evaluated for images with no postprocessing, images processed with N4 bias field correction algorithm, and the UNICORN algorithm.

Statistical Tests: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for measuring the interrater reliability. ICC and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the R statistical package employing a two-way mixed-effects model based on a mean rating (k = 3) for absolute agreement. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test with continuity correction was used for analyzing the overall image quality scores.

Results: UNICORN was preferred among the three methods evaluated for uniformity in 97.9% of the pooled ratings, with excellent interrater agreement (ICC of 0.98, CI 0.97-0.99). UNICORN was also rated better than N4 for contrast and equivalent to N4 in SNR with ICCs of 0.80 (CI 0.72-0.86) and 0.67 (CI 0.54-0.77), respectively. The overall image quality scores for UNICORN were significantly higher than N4 (P < 6 × 10 ), with good to excellent interrater agreement (ICC 0.90, CI 0.86-0.93).

Data Conclusion: Without the use of a reference scan, UNICORN provides better image uniformity, contrast, and overall image quality at 7T compared with the N4 bias field-correction algorithm.

Level Of Evidence: 4 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:1534-1544.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26691DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image quality
16
uniform combined
8
combined reconstruction
8
reference scan
8
uniformity contrast
8
excellent interrater
8
interrater agreement
8
agreement icc
8
image
7
unicorn
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!