Introduction: We describe a bone-graft technique, for shoulder arthroplasty in patients with severe glenoid bone loss, that utilizes a "step cut," a trapezoidal bone wedge from the resected humeral head, and graft fixation with screws placed from posterior to anterior through the graft.
Step 1 Preoperative Planning: Carry out preoperative planning for the step-cut procedure.
Step 2 Surgical Approach And Preparation Of The Glenoid: Expose the glenoid for bone graft insertion, taking care to avoid excessive reaming.
Step 3 Prepare The Glenoid Bone Graft: Cut the appropriately sized glenoid bone graft from the resected humeral head.
Step 4 Insert And Fix The Glenoid Bone Graft: Position the bone graft in the glenoid defect and stabilize it with screws.
Step 5 Prepare The Glenoid Surface: Create an even concave surface between the anterior aspect of the glenoid and the posterior aspect of the graft.
Step 6 Place The Glenoid Implant: Position the glenoid component following step-cut graft implantation.
Postoperative Rehabilitation: Postoperative rehabilitation is mostly the same as that for standard total shoulder replacement without bone-grafting.
Results: The range of motion improved significantly in our study of twelve patients (p < 0.001).IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6359918 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.M.00052 | DOI Listing |
Oper Orthop Traumatol
March 2025
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, spezielle Unfallchirurgie, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Hans Nolte Str. 1, 32429, Minden, Deutschland.
Objective: Safe and bone-sparing implantation of a stem- and cement-free reversed shoulder prosthesis.
Indications: Shoulder arthritis with rotator cuff degeneration, symptomatic rotator cuff arthropathy with no further therapy, posttraumatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, humeral head necrosis, revision surgery after implantation of a surface prosthesis.
Contraindications: Infection, axillary nerve lesion, deltoid muscle insufficiency, insufficient central glenoid bone substance for glenoid screw fixation.
Arthroscopy
March 2025
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Electronic address:
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes between patients who received arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR) using distal tibia allograft with button fixation versus screw fixation.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who underwent AAGR with button or screw fixation between 2012 and 2021. Patients were matched at a 1:1 ratio based on sex, type of surgery, and time since surgery.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
March 2025
Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Purpose: The objective of this study was to analyze the concordance of the results obtained when culturing samples that are obtained with three different methods.
Methods: Prospective study that includes primary Reverse shoulder arthroplasties. From all the patients, 9 cultures were obtained.
Orthop J Sports Med
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Shoulder Disease Center, Seoul Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: All-suture anchors have various configurations during deployment and different biomechanical characteristics because of their soft anchor bodies.
Hypothesis/purpose: This study aimed to analyze the clinical and radiological differences of all-suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair based on their deployment configurations. It was hypothesized that each all-suture anchor would yield comparable clinical outcomes regardless of radiological differences in the pattern of glenoid bone reaction.
Orthop Clin North Am
April 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15203, USA. Electronic address:
The most common surgical treatment options for anterior shoulder instability include the arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without adjunct procedures such as remplissage, the open Bankart repair, the Bristow-Latarjet procedure, and anterior free bone block transfers. The choice between non-operative treatment and 1 of the aforementioned procedures inherently impact the risk of recurrent instability. The purpose of this article is to discuss the timing of surgery in the in-season athlete, evaluate the evolving concept of glenoid and bipolar bone loss, and to discuss various surgical treatment options with a specific focus on minimizing recurrent instability rates following surgical stabilization.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!