Variability of allergens in commercial fish extracts for skin prick testing.

Allergy

Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.

Published: July 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study highlights that commercial fish allergen extracts lack regulatory standardization, which may affect the accuracy of skin prick testing (SPT) for diagnosing fish allergies.
  • Researchers analyzed 26 different fish extracts and found significant variability in protein content and IgE reactivity, with some major allergens, like parvalbumin, missing from several extracts.
  • The findings indicate an urgent need for standardized allergen extracts to enhance the reliability of fish allergy diagnostics and support better patient management.

Article Abstract

Background: Commercial allergen extracts for allergy skin prick testing (SPT) are widely used for diagnosing fish allergy. However, there is currently no regulatory requirement for standardization of protein and allergen content, potentially impacting the diagnostic reliability of SPTs. We therefore sought to analyse commercial fish extracts for the presence and concentration of fish proteins and in vitro IgE reactivity using serum from fish-allergic patients.

Methods: Twenty-six commercial fish extracts from five different manufacturers were examined. The protein concentrations were determined, protein compositions analysed by mass spectrometry, followed by SDS-PAGE and subsequent immunoblotting with antibodies detecting 4 fish allergens (parvalbumin, tropomyosin, aldolase and collagen). IgE-reactive proteins were identified using serum from 16 children with confirmed IgE-mediated fish allergy, with focus on cod, tuna and salmon extracts.

Results: The total protein, allergen concentration and IgE reactivity of the commercial extracts varied over 10-fold between different manufacturers and fish species. The major fish allergen parvalbumin was not detected by immunoblotting in 6/26 extracts. In 7/12 extracts, five known fish allergens were detected by mass spectrometry. For cod and tuna, almost 70% of patients demonstrated the strongest IgE reactivity to collagen, tropomyosin, aldolase A or β-enolase but not parvalbumin.

Conclusions: Commercial fish extracts often contain insufficient amounts of important allergens including parvalbumin and collagen, resulting in low IgE reactivity. A comprehensive proteomic approach for the evaluation of SPT extracts for their utility in allergy diagnostics is presented. There is an urgent need for standardized allergen extracts, which will improve the diagnosis and management of fish allergy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/all.13748DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

commercial fish
16
fish extracts
16
ige reactivity
16
fish
12
fish allergy
12
extracts
10
skin prick
8
prick testing
8
allergen extracts
8
protein allergen
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!