AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) in Quebec aimed at improving management of fragility fractures over a 2-year period in an outpatient setting.
  • Data on patient demographics, treatment initiation, and follow-up was collected to identify gaps in osteoporosis care and the effectiveness of secondary fracture prevention programs.
  • Findings revealed that while over 70% of participants were prescribed anti-osteoporosis medication, nearly 30% had prior fractures without effective treatment at the time of their incident fracture, indicating significant areas for improvement.

Article Abstract

Unlabelled: The study design of a multidisciplinary Fracture Liaison Service (2-year follow-up) aiming to optimize fragility fracture management in an outpatient setting is presented. Patient characteristics, investigation, and treatment initiation data at baseline were recorded. Results corroborate the care gap in osteoporosis management, reinforcing the need for secondary fracture prevention programs.

Purpose: This paper describes the study design, implementation, and baseline characteristics of a multidisciplinary Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) in Quebec (Canada).

Methods: A FLS was implemented as a prospective cohort study. After identification, fracture risk was assessed and patients were started on treatment or referred, according to guidelines and risk assessment. Thereafter, patients were systematically followed over 2 years. Clinical data (fractures, bone density, blood testing (bone turnover markers), quality of life, physical disability) as well as administrative data (pharmacological, health services, hospitalization) was collected. Baseline descriptive data was analyzed and presented.

Results: Of 542 recruited participants, 532 underwent baseline assessment (85.7% female, mean age 63.4 years). Overall, 29.7% of participants either withdrew from the study or were lost to follow-up. Almost 27% were referred to a specialist, while > 70% received anti-osteoporosis medication prescriptions through the FLS at baseline. Mean femoral T-score was - 1.6 ± 1.0 and vertebral T-score was - 1.7 ± 1.4. Nearly 19% of subjects reported being under anti-osteoporosis medication at the time of incident fracture. Thirty-three percent of participants reported a prior fracture history, of which 29.7% reported being given anti-osteoporosis therapy. Most fracture sites were to the wrist and ankle, while < 19% were hip/femur or vertebral fractures.

Conclusions: These results highlight the important care gap in fragility fracture management and reinforce the need for secondary fracture prevention programs. This prospective study will allow the evaluation of key performance indicators for outpatient clinic-based FLS, such as medication usage, by combining prospective clinical and administrative data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0571-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

study design
12
fracture liaison
12
liaison service
12
fracture
9
descriptive data
8
multidisciplinary fracture
8
anti-osteoporosis medication
8
reported anti-osteoporosis
8
data
5
baseline
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!