Background: Re-operation rates following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for early invasive breast cancer are highly variable, largely due to uncertainty regarding adequate margins. The 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines recommended "no ink on tumor" as adequate margins. We evaluated the effect of guideline implementation on re-operation following BCS at our regional cancer center.
Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed on records for patients with early invasive breast carcinoma undergoing BCS between February 2011 and May 2017. Time period, pathologic margin status, patient and tumor characteristics were assessed for their impact on re-operation rates.
Results: Overall re-operation rate decreased following the guidelines release (OR 0.28, 95% C.I. 0.15-0.51, p = <0.0001), with an unadjusted decrease of 3.89%. Re-operations on both close (OR 0.17, 95% C.I. 0.07-0.40, p = <0.0001) and widely negative (OR 0.20, 95% C.I. 0.05-0.77, p = 0.02) margins decreased in the post-guidelines time period.
Conclusion: SSO-ASTRO margins guideline release was associated with decreased re-operation. Furthermore, re-operations rates decreased in patients with pathologically negative margins, the target population the guidelines were meant to address.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.007 | DOI Listing |
Breast J
January 2025
Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Introduction: Breast cancer management is complex, requiring personalised care from multidisciplinary teams. Research shows that there is unwarranted clinical variation in mastectomy rates between rural and metropolitan patients; that is, variation in treatment which cannot be explained by disease progression or medical necessity. This study aims to determine the clinical and nonclinical factors contributing to any unwarranted variation in breast cancer management in rural patients and to evaluate how these factors and variations relate to patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Med
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan.
Background: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is considered a de-escalating adjuvant treatment for breast cancer low-risk patients. However, the broader criteria applied by the Taiwan IORT Study Cooperative Group led to an increased rate of locoregional recurrence (LRR) among patients receiving only IORT. Consequently, we revised the criteria for sole IORT treatment to include patients who meet the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) eligibility standards.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Ital Chir
December 2024
Department of General Surgery, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, 35620 Izmir, Turkey.
Aim: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in conjunction with surgical intervention is becoming increasingly prominent in the field of oncology. NAT enhance the probability of breast-conserving surgery in cases of locally advanced breast cancer and in patients with metastatic or inoperable disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Surg Oncol
December 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France. Electronic address:
Purpose: To analyse the clinical and histological characteristics of breast cancers (BC) occurring after Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), as well as their outcome with particular attention to the effectiveness and safety of breast-conservative surgery with radiation therapy (RT).
Materials And Methods: This is a retrospective study of 218 patients who developed stage 0 to III BC after treatment for mediastinal HL between 1951 and 2022. Comprehensive demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were collected for HL and BC, as well as survival and locoregional control.
Br J Surg
December 2024
Bristol Surgical and Perioperative Care Complex Intervention Collaboration, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Background: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery may be a better option than mastectomy, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking. The aim of the ANTHEM study (ISRCTN18238549) was to explore clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a multicentre cohort of women offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction.
Methods: Women with invasive/pre-invasive breast cancer who were offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with volume replacement or displacement techniques to avoid mastectomy were recruited prospectively.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!