AI Article Synopsis

  • The SNARC effect describes how people with left-to-right reading habits respond faster to small numbers on the left and large numbers on the right when comparing their sizes or judging their parity.
  • Right brain-damaged patients with left-sided neglect exhibit an exaggerated SNARC effect for large numbers in magnitude comparisons and show selective delays when comparing numbers close to a reference point.
  • The study finds that while neglect patients have a normal reaction time pattern in parity judgment tasks, they struggle with magnitude comparison, indicating that different cognitive processes are at play for these tasks.

Article Abstract

The SNARC effect reflects the observation that when healthy observers with left-to-right reading habits are asked to compare the magnitude or to judge the parity of numbers, they provide faster reaction times (RT) to small numbers with left-sided responses and faster RTs to large numbers with right-sided responses. In magnitude comparison (MC), right brain damaged patients with left-sided neglect typically show a pathologically enlarged SNARC for large numbers and selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference (e.g. 4 for reference 5). This asymmetry has been taken as evidence that small numbers are mentally positioned to the left of the reference and, therefore, are processed less efficiently by patients neglecting the left side of space. In parity judgement (PJ), on the other hand, the size of the SNARC effect is unaffected by neglect. This dissociation is typically attributed to the disturbed explicit processing of number magnitude in MC and preserved implicit processing of magnitude in PJ. Before accepting this interpretation, however, it remains to be investigated whether neglect patients show the same RT pattern that characterizes the performance of healthy participants (i.e. left-side RTs that increase linearly as a function of number magnitude and right-side RTs that decrease linearly as a function of magnitude). Clarifying this point is crucial, because an equally sized SNARC can originate from different RT patterns. Here we demonstrate that the RT pattern of neglect patients during PJ is entirely comparable to those of patients without neglect and healthy controls, while the same neglect patients show selective slowing to numbers that are immediately lower than the numerical reference in MC. These findings suggest the existence of multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitude and provides an explanation of the functional dissociation between MC and PJ tasks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05483-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

number magnitude
12
neglect patients
12
multiple left-to-right
8
left-to-right spatial
8
spatial representations
8
representations number
8
small numbers
8
large numbers
8
selective slowing
8
slowing numbers
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!