[Bibliometric analysis of neurosurgery publications in France].

Neurochirurgie

Service de neurochirurgie, université Caen Normandie, CHU Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen, France; Service de neurochirurgie, CHU Côte de Nacre, avenue Côte de Nacre, 14009 Caen, France. Electronic address:

Published: February 2019

Bibliometrics are methods used to quantitatively analyze the scientific literature. The application of bibliometrics in neurosurgery is emerging and has not yet been studied in the French neurosurgical community. In France, the most used statistical method is named SIGAPS; the scores are based on the position of the author and the impact factor of the journal. The SIGAPS score, which can be calculated for a research team or an individual, impacts the public financial support of university hospitals in France. We analyzed retrospectively the publication productivity and the SIGAPS score of university neurosurgery departments in France for the period 2009-2016. This was supplemented by a list of current academic research protocols granted by the Minister of Health. The SIGAPS score is higher in large university hospitals even though all teams are dedicated to publishing more in the traditional neurosurgery journals (Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery, World Neurosurgery, J Neuro-oncology, Neuro oncology, Eur Spine J). Of note, the national Neurochirurgie journal (publishing in French and English) is progressively improving its impact factor (0.8). The most common themes are functional neurosurgery, neuro-oncology and spine. There are 14 on-going national multicenter research programs, 4 of them focused on the health economics of treatment innovations. These data provide the most accurate available snapshot of the scholarly efforts of all the French university neurosurgery departments. It is based on a national statistics method (SIGAPS). For future evaluation, it should be combined with internationally available parameters such as the h-index and m-quotient. Publication productivity has broad implications for the success of both academic departments and individual faculty members and their financial support.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2018.08.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sigaps score
12
neurosurgery
9
impact factor
8
financial support
8
university hospitals
8
publication productivity
8
university neurosurgery
8
neurosurgery departments
8
neurosurgery neuro-oncology
8
sigaps
5

Similar Publications

Introduction: The French Hip & Knee Surgery Society (SFHG) brings together French-speaking hip and knee expert surgeons. There has been an exponential growth of orthopaedic surgical activity over the last decade and hip and knee surgery clinical research has had a similar growth. Despite this, the SFHG's contribution to the orthopaedic literature remains poorly known.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Although the SIGAPS scoring system is extremely beneficial in evaluating the quality of academic papers and individual research achievement, values for author ranking may vary by country. If a SIGAPS scoring system outside of France is considered, the weighting by author ranking should also be reconsidered.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the relationship between the quantity and quality of clinical trial papers published by 11 core research hospitals, showing that simply counting publications is not enough to measure research effectiveness.
  • A scoring system was used to evaluate the quality of 580 surveyed papers based on their journal impact factor relative to the number of publications.
  • Results indicated no significant correlation between the number of papers and their quality, suggesting that institutions should assess both quality and quantity when evaluating clinical research performance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Bibliometric analysis is being used more and more in orthopedics and traumatology. However, the quantity and quality of publications authored by French orthopedic and trauma surgeons outside their discipline have never been analyzed, nor has the change in the quality of orthopedics publications. This led us to carry out a bibliometric analysis to answer the following questions: 1) How has the quantity of scientific production by French orthopedists changed over the past 10 years? 2) How has the quality of the overall scientific production by French orthopedists changed over the past 10 years?

Hypothesis: From 2008 to 2017, the production of French orthopedists has increased in quantity and quality in orthopedics and other medical fields.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Bibliometric analysis of neurosurgery publications in France].

Neurochirurgie

February 2019

Service de neurochirurgie, université Caen Normandie, CHU Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen, France; Service de neurochirurgie, CHU Côte de Nacre, avenue Côte de Nacre, 14009 Caen, France. Electronic address:

Bibliometrics are methods used to quantitatively analyze the scientific literature. The application of bibliometrics in neurosurgery is emerging and has not yet been studied in the French neurosurgical community. In France, the most used statistical method is named SIGAPS; the scores are based on the position of the author and the impact factor of the journal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!