Purpose: There are no universally accepted guidelines for assessing driving readiness in adolescents with narcolepsy. The purpose of the present study was to survey pediatric sleep medicine providers regarding their current practice patterns for assessing driving readiness in adolescents with narcolepsy, knowledge of their state laws regarding physician reporting of unsafe drivers, and opinions regarding what physician duty ought to be.
Methods: This was an anonymous web-based survey distributed via the PedSleep listserv, which serves as a hub of communication for pediatric sleep medicine providers.
Results: A total of 52 pediatric sleep providers from 25 different states completed the survey. Eighty-eight percent of providers routinely assess driving readiness in adolescents with narcolepsy. Factors rated as "absolutely essential" by at least 50% of respondents included the following: history of previous fall-asleep crash or near miss, sleepiness (reported by patient), sleepiness (reported by caregiver), and cataplexy (reported by patient). Providers included maintenance of wakefulness testing: never (34%), if patient reports no/mild sleepiness (10%), if patient reports moderate/severe sleepiness (25%), or always regardless of patient symptoms (30%), and the median minimally acceptable result was 30 min (25-75th: 20-40 min). There was substantial lack of knowledge regarding legal obligations for reporting.
Conclusions: These results demonstrate great variability in practice patterns among pediatric sleep medicine providers for assessing driving readiness in adolescents with narcolepsy. In addition, it shows limited knowledge of the providers about their respective states' laws. Further studies are required to identify the best approach to assess residual sleepiness in this population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11325-019-01799-2 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Public Health Surveill
January 2025
Centre of Sleep Medicine and Epileptology Barmelweid, Klinik Barmelweid AG, Aargau, Switzerland.
Background: Stimulants are potent treatments for central hypersomnolence disorders or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders/attention deficit disorders but concerns have been raised about their potential negative consequences and their increasing prescription rates.
Objective: We aimed to describe stimulant prescription trends in Switzerland from 2014 to 2021. Second, we aimed to analyze the characteristics of individuals who received stimulant prescriptions in 2021 and investigate the link between stimulant prescriptions and hospitalization rates in 2021, using hospitalization as a potential indicator of adverse health outcomes.
Psychopharmacol Bull
January 2025
Abhishek Reddy, MD, Assistant Professor, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Sleep Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, United States.
J Med Case Rep
December 2024
Ibn Sina Hospital, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Background: Sleep disorders are a common health problem that can be classified into many types that are distinguished by their history and characteristics. In this case report, we discuss a case of a patient suffering from recurrent unusual prolonged sleep attacks lasting up to 9 days that responded excellently to levetiracetam.
Case Presentation: An 18-year-old Syrian male patient presented to the neurology department complaining of recurrent prolonged sleep episodes lasting for 9 days.
Sleep Med
December 2024
Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address:
Sleep Med
January 2025
Department of Child Neurology and Department of Sleep Medicine, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Janet Weis Children's Hospital, Danville, PA, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!