The linear no-threshold (LNT) model of ionizing radiation-induced cancer assumes that every increment of radiation dose, no matter how small, constitutes an increased cancer risk for humans. Linear no-threshold is presently the most widely applied model for radiation risk assessment. As such, it imposes very heavy burden on the society in both economic and human terms. This model, which was adopted in late 1950s in the wake of massive government investments in science, is controversial and raises important ethical issues. This article identifies 2 issues often missed: scientists usurping the role of policy makers and seeking funding and power. These issues should be considered together with the scientific controversy raging over the validity of the LNT model and the multiple other ethical issues regarding its ongoing use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343444PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1559325818822602DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

linear no-threshold
12
lnt model
8
ethical issues
8
model
5
ethics adoption
4
adoption linear
4
no-threshold model
4
model linear
4
no-threshold lnt
4
model ionizing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!