Scope: Wine has shown anticarcinogenic benefits in hepatocarcinoma and polyphenols seem to be responsible for these effects. Wine lees are the sediments produced during fermentation and they endow wine with organoleptic and physicochemical properties. However, the anticarcinogenic role of these compounds is still unknown. Thus, the purpose of this work is to determine the phytochemical profiles of wine lees and then to analyze their anticarcinogenic effect and DNA methylation on a model of hepatocarcinogenesis.
Methods And Results: The phytochemical composition of lees is determined by the Folin-Ciocalteu method and high-performance liquid chromatography. An in vivo study using a diethyl nitrosamine-hepatocarcinogenesis-induced model is performed to investigate the hepatoprotective properties of different doses of wine lees. For the DNA methylation analysis, a bisulfite-based method is used. Both types of lees mostly contain pyrogallol, gallic, and syringic acid with a high content of catechins in red lees. The carcinogen hypermethylates the Alu-M2 repetitive sequence and white lees decreases the hypermethylation at all tested concentrations. Low concentration of red and white lees and high concentration of white lees significantly improve the hepatocellular architecture and decrease the mitotic index in the murine model.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that wine lees are promising agents for chemoprevention of hepatocarcinoma.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201800864 | DOI Listing |
Plants (Basel)
December 2024
Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China.
Crop rotation is widely recognized as a key strategy to mitigate the adverse effects associated with continuous cropping. Recent studies have demonstrated that biochar has a significant potential for preventing and controlling these challenges. However, the ameliorative effects of green manure rotation and biochar application on continuous pepper cultivation in the karst mountainous regions of Southwest China remain largely unexplored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Food Microbiol
December 2024
Department of Agronomy Food Natural resources Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy; Interdepartmental Centre for Research in Viticulture and Enology (CIRVE), University of Padova, Viale XXVIII Aprile 14, 31015 Conegliano, TV, Italy; Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy.
The management of post-fermentation phase is essential for the protection of wine oxidation. The prolonged contact of yeast lees and wine can help to limit this problem, although off-flavours can originate. It is known that some cellular components (mannoproteins, lipids, glutathione, etc.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Environ Manage
December 2024
INRAE, Univ Montpellier, LBE, 102 Avenue des Etangs, 11100 Narbonne, France.
Food Chem
February 2025
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Enotria 2/C, 12051 Alba, Italy. Electronic address:
Cold liquid stabulation aims to extract valuable compounds from grape lees before juice clarification. In this study, 7, 14, and 21 days of lees contact were tested on aroma-neutral 'Arneis' and 'Cortese' grape juices vs control. Basic parameters, colour, polyphenols, antioxidant capacity, and volatile organic compounds were assessed throughout winemaking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Agric Food Chem
November 2024
Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Road, Wuxi 214122, China.
Wine lees is a low value biomass resource rich in cellulose, with great potential for producing organic fertilizers and chemicals. However, the high acidity of wine lees limits the catalytic efficiency of the conversion tool endoglucanase. Here, we expressed endoglucanase tCel5A from in , and the combination of promoter AOX1 and signal peptide SUC2 resulted in a highly active expression of 4632.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!